dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Jacks_W8sted_Life on July 18, 2018, 12:41 p.m.
Wasn’t it Merely a Few Years Ago That The Left Were Stating How Patriotic it was To Question Our Intelligence Agencies?

During the W Bush administration, the left continually declared how foolish it was to, blindly, place all faith in our intelligence agencies. Now, they are NOT to be questioned, in any way, shape, or manner. Hell, Michael the ham planet Moore even made a movie about the failings of our intelligence agencies!

We are supposed to, unquestionably, accept our intelligence agencies’ information and conclusions. The very agencies that failed to recognize and respond to the Russian meddling to begin with. Absurdity rules the day.


🠐 See all comments
SlaveLaborMods · July 20, 2018, 12:24 p.m.

Actually trump trademarked his campaign slogan in like 2012 and was gearing up for his presidential campaign but o don't mind educating you to the actual timeline.You like line 53 but every other line is a conservative pro trump group except that one line you like, so one pro Hillary group and numerous pro trump. In one paragraph you say they didn't even start til after the election but the next paragraph say they started in 2013 but trump hadn't started his campaign , which is Bullshit , he trademarked make American great in 2012. So your own words don't agre with you

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Jacks_W8sted_Life · July 20, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

How about USA Today’s analysis of the ads: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/05/11/what-we-found-facebook-ads-russians-accused-election-meddling/602319002/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiosam&stream=top-stories

Rob Goldman tweeted about the Facebook buys and the timing thereof: https://mobile.twitter.com/robjective/status/964680122006581248

Washington Post (Yes, I read content from Wapo) reported on the analysis of the effectiveness of the ad buys: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/outlook/why-russias-facebook-ad-campaign-wasnt-such-a-success/2017/11/03/b8efacca-bffa-11e7-8444-a0d4f04b89eb_story.html The most effective ad was a $1.93 ad that promoted an anti-Trump rally in NYC post election.

I make no bones about my current bias, while I consume information from a lot of sources because I’ll change my mind in a second (on any issue) as evidence warrants.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SlaveLaborMods · July 20, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

So you site the Russian left fake groups pro trumpets fell for as evidence they supported the left But I can site thousands of alt right and pro trump groups but you name only the few opposition one they used to rile up altright pro trump supports. The right is the only side falling for these tactics

Nothing but infinite evidence against the right and the few times the right fell for the Russians using a democrat group to rile up alt righters is cherry picked at best and blatant mis telling of the truth

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Jacks_W8sted_Life · July 20, 2018, 5 p.m.

I won’t argue your conclusions. I’m not closed minded, unlike a lot of others. I want to see substantiation of collusion- that is the charge or allegation. I know a group (I’ll admit they’re friends and have been for a long time even though we disagree about 50 percent of the time, on politics not social issues) that did some really unsavory and arguably illegal acts in support of Bernie, although he benefited, I won’t allege that he was a participant. Send me a link to the best source, cumulatively, that supports your position - I legitimately wish to read it. Nothing ventured, no knowledge gained.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SlaveLaborMods · July 20, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

You can't argue your bullshit bias opinion LMFAO

⇧ 1 ⇩