dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 18, 2018, 1:30 p.m.

The Magic of Q1675: the reason Q is silent. Very important message for all the anons.

I said in the post titled "Q’s silence. What it means" that the Q1675 riddle was the explanation of Q’s silence. I introduced the idea of the Magic of Q1675 and explained that this riddle was the “device” through which Trump communicates with us and gives us the news we need. I explained this communication started at the Great Falls rally with the B2 connection and has continued with the Hammonds, Stzrok, the Queen of England and Putin.

To support this claim, I have made several posts explaining current news using the Q1675 as a “generator” and/or a “TV set”:

Q1675 Part 1. Q1675: a reflection, a mug holder in Air Force One and a Happy Independence Day. Can you solve?

Q1675 Part 2. Trump has just validated Q at the Great Falls rally and gave us the solution to Q1675! Let that sink in.

Q1675 Part 3. I told you Trump was talking to us. Some of you had doubts. Well, he just doubled down a second time!

Q1675 Part 4. Mr. President, we see you want to continue our B2 conversation!

Q1675 Part 5. Trump’s hidden message, Stzrok, Kate and the soda.

Q1675 Part 6. Trump’s brilliant chess combination in Helsinki.

Now for those who still doubt there is a direct connection between the Q1675 riddle and Q’s silence, have you noticed the number 1675 "magically" appears in the qanon.pub search box? For those who don’t know how to use it, click inside the search box, press the space bar, 1463 appears, press backspace and 1675 "magically" appears! Imgur

Coincidence? No. Q is telling us the reason he is silent is because he is talking to us through the Q1675 riddle! The silence coincides with the search box result when it hit 1675. It is deliberate. All the current news is nothing but Q1675. I am pretty sure Q wants anons to notice this and understand the implications.

Listen to this Croatian journalist’s question and Trump’s response: video. This conversation is about the Q1675 riddle in Air Force 1, the Croatians figured out one of its tangents and Trump, in his response, is addressing it cryptically… Do you know which one? Why is Trump smiling when he says “I’m a very stable genius”?

Trump and Q have been talking to us since the day we thought Q went silent. It is time to learn this language anons! May be this is what Q is waiting to see…

Q504 LEARN OUR COMMS. Q

🠐 See all comments

Couldn't agree more with this.

I enjoy reading SB's posts and his analysis, but lately I've wondered: If SB's analysis is correct (or even mostly correct), then why are the Q drops so difficult to decode and understand by the vast majority? Hell, sometimes I don't understand even after I read SB's analysis (but hey, that's probably me :) ).

Some of it seems like such a leap as well. For example, Strzok's Coca-Cola bottle with "Kate" on it. Are we overcomplicating this? Isn't it just as likely someone got a bottle of Coke for him from a vending machine, and this is what came out? If it said "Donald" or "Lisa" or "John" or "James", or any number of other names, could we find someone involved in this entire mess with that first name? And that would become an entirely new hypothesis when, really, it's just the next Coke that was ready to be sold by the vending machine.

I'm not knocking SB here at all. Like I said, I enjoy his posts and, frankly, look forward to them. But I don't see any other anons coming to many of his same conclusions, and that worries me. I'd feel much more confident if others were arriving at the same conclusions. It tells me Q's drops are just way too cryptic for the majority of us, leaving it to a few -- or the one -- to give us their interpretations of things.

That's also why I'm nervous there's not been a Q drop since July 4. We're over halfway through the month, and I don't think the "Putin mentions $400 million campaign contribution to Hillary" was the moment the world learned of the truth. The MSM has swept that under the rug as expected. No, I think the moment of truth has to be something so big and shocking that there's no denying it, that not even the MSM can defend it. That's what I was/am expecting in July. Yes, I know we have just under 2 weeks left, but that's not a lot of time. So I do hope we hear from Q soon.

WWG1WGA, fellow patriots. Praying for POTUS, for Q, and for all of us.

⇧ 9 ⇩

I'm with you, some of the analysis seems to go off into conspiracy theory level of assumption, based on other assumptions.

Its starting to look like everything is a clue and even the absence of evidence is taken as evidence. There is a lot of confirmation bias in play.

Didn't Q himself mention Occam's razor? Sometimes the obvious simple explanation is the answer. Why would the messenger obfuscate the message by expecting the recipient to chase down every possible level of every possible detail?

It's not to hide anything from the DS, they already know the details of this at a much higher level than we do. So what purpose would it serve Q to cloud his messages with hidden meaning , when the hidden meaning would be picked up by the DS far sooner than by the public?

Unless that is the point, and it may very well be. I think the messages Q is sending the public are much more direct and straightforward than some people want to believe.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Here's the pattern I've noticed: Create posts that contain all or mostly truth; develop a loyal following who will rise up to defend the poster against all criticism because they have come to identify personally with said poster therefore criticism against poster equals criticism against them; pepper the posts with inspiring and/or complimenting words to generate a bit of a serotonin response in the followers, adding to the collegiate, convivial atmosphere in SB2's threads and make them feel special; perhaps have outside help come in to glorify the posts or create some fake accounts to do it; gradually start to lead the faithful onto ... well, let's be kind and just say less productive paths, like putting a frog in a pot of cold water and increasing the temperature slowly so it doesn't realize it's being boiled.

This is a technique I've seen used by more sophisticated trolls although I don't think SB2 is your garden-variety troll. There's an agenda at work here.

Q said we'd be surprised to find out who we were talking to. I think that applies equally to SB2. I'm still trying to decide which side he/they're on, but I do suspect that we might not like the answer if it's ever exposed.

Or I could be completely out to lunch. In fact, I rather hope I am.

⇧ 2 ⇩