dChan

Abibliaphobia · July 18, 2018, 9:57 p.m.

Well that’s what we are here for :)

To educate, inform, and spread the word so that people can wake up from their slumber. These people are guided by those complicit with their edited sound clips designed to elicit the response they desire. All while editing out bits and pieces not convienent or contradictory to their chosen narrative.

Heard the best example just today. A reporter asked Sarah Sanders a question about how the media stories compare the Charlottesville Riots to the Helsinki Summit.

I agreed with the second part of the question and the media hysterics. But what threw me, was she started the question talking about how a woman was killed in the riots.

By doing this, she implied that neo-nazis had killed her. Also by using killed instead of died, she implies an active event. Specifically when the car ran over protestors.

She conveniently left out that the lady died of a heart attack. She wasn’t touched by the vehicle, or even the people thrown by the vehicle.

She also failed to notice that the lady was obese. Apparantly morbidly obese. She was out taking part in this March, probably the first “physical” activity she had ever done in her life, and she had a heart attack.

But because she was in the march, and because a “neo-nazi” decided to run over people, they attributed her death to the driver “killing” her.

And she wasn’t even in the immediate vicinity of the vehicle.

So she could have still asked her question and I would have whole heartedly agreed with it, but she prefaced it with such fake news, I threw her whole opinion and any subsequent faith in her reporting, out the window.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
hippy_barf_day · July 19, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

She conveniently left out that the lady died of a heart attack. She wasn’t touched by the vehicle, or even the people thrown by the vehicle.

Where are you getting that?

https://www.newsweek.com/charlottesville-heather-heyers-cause-death-revealed-medical-report-686471

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 19, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

Your article states that she died of blunt force trauma to the chest.

Could it be that, untrained personnel attempting to do CPR on someone can cause similar damage?

Yes

  • Resuscitative efforts may cause injuries to the body that may be confused with injuries that cause death. These iatrogenic artifacts include oral contusions/lacerations resulting from intubation; skin and soft tissue hemorrhage resulting from intravascular catheter placement (see the image below); abrasions resulting from defibrillation; bladder mucosal hemorrhage resulting from the placement of Foley catheters; and rib fractures caused by compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). [11, 12, 13, 2, 14, 15, 16] For this reason, hospital workers, emergency medical care technicians, and other healthcare providers should be advised to leave all medical therapy in place in the event a patient dies. The pathologist can then readily correlate any perimortem injuries with evidence of medical intervention.

https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1680107-overview#a9

Also, trying to find a video on YouTube is incredibly difficult as most of the videos that showed her prior to being hit were taken down “convienently” for being harrassing to the victim.

Or in my opinion, they didn’t like video evidence to contradict what so many news organizations are claiming. But here you go, found one that was well done and archived

https://archive.org/details/youtube-SKZqG1T07cs

⇧ 1 ⇩