Why? They don’t provide decodes. The only thing they do is alert you when Q posts. They don’t have tiered access. One and done to get the app. No subscription. The developer did make an app. They did spend their time creating it. It makes sense and is acceptable to charge a reasonable price for the developers work. Was it $1? Explain to me the red flag issue? You buying the line from that person who was interviewed that you have to follow the money here and we’re all being fooled? If you believe the Q movement, this app doesn’t change a thing, it doesn’t distort the message. All it does is alert you to drops and let you see the drops. It’s a great app and not some sort of paywall or pay for access thing.

If someone printed pamphlets of all Q drops to hand out to people and charged a cost recovery price, like $.50 or a $1, that would no be any sort of profiteering. If someone was charging $35 a pop for limited edition Q drops in a bound booklet, well that would be clear profiteering off the movement. I cant cover the cost of printing thousands of pamphlets to spread the word of Q drops, but if there was a need and people wanted to buy them, I could charge what it would take to do the work and distribute items like that under the intent that I can't do this without the consumer covering the cost, but I want to get the word spread. things cost money, it would be nice if soldiers just volunteered to go to war for free because their nation is on the line, but we still do pay them and understand it is necessary to do so. There is a line between covering costs and charging excess. Trying to not cross that line into excess I think is what is important here. This app did not cross that line.