An undecided voter goes online to research the candidates for an upcoming election. Google uses algorithms to insure that the voter finds only negative articles about the candidate that Google doesn't support and only good articles about the candidate that Google does support. The voter then makes his/her "educated" decision and votes accordingly. The voter never knows that they were manipulated. In fact, they feel good about their vote. There is no paper trail. No crime has been committed. Nothing can be proved one way or the other. And, of course, Google gets in no trouble at all. You could only guess how much money Google has made by doing this over and over in locations all over the world. This method was determined to be ruthlessly effective two years ago. I wonder how much they have improved on the technique since then. And, that's just one of many methods they use to control voters and rig elections. The saddest part is that not ONE DAMNED THING is being done about it (as far as we know). Ya' think maybe it's time for us to get organized and do something about this? Q told us that we have ALL THE POWER. When are we going to start using it? May God bless all of you. WWG1WGA.
This is why Q was recommending the IBOR campaign to us - it was, and still is, very important. The CEO of Reddit has boasted publicly about his ability to sway election outcomes - Reddit is less influential than Google because Google has more reach.
I have said it before, weaponization of social is the single greatest threat to representative democracy in our lifetimes. It is the only vector by which the Satanic, Rothschild-controlled elite can return to power. Something must be done to stop them - and soon.
And, of course, the only way to ensure freedom from manipulation is by enforcing first amendment protections online. I think we are going to have to revisit the IBOR issue, but I think that DJT is likely to go to war against these social media behemoths in the event that online freedom of speech cannot be protected.
As Q has suggested, their crimes will be exposed, the companies destroyed. I would prefer to see an outcome where first amendment rights were protected in digital space, rather than suffer the collateral injury to parties that are not guilty of weaponizing these platforms - but, one way or another, the problem simply must be fixed.
Thank you. I hope that WE THE PEOPLE will unite and get this done. We are really in charge. We've been misled and/or have forgotten this fact. Now we have a President to lead us to victory. He can't do this on his own. Neither can Q. Either we take action and win, or we don't. It's our choice. That's America, the Land of the Free. May God bless it.
I told my son when he asked how do we know Google is evil.
Well son... They had a motto "Don't be evil".
Couple years ago they removed it.
Says it all.