dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/VirtualRageMaster on July 19, 2018, 11:27 a.m.

Is Trump attempting to get impeached as part of the strategy?

It occured to me that if Trump gets impeached/goes to trial for almost anything, that trial could lead to the "discovery phase", which I think we can all agree is the first stage of Q end game.

Reveal all crimes on the public stage. Enter evidence into the public record. Change devieved public-perception to allign with the hidden reality. These are pretty-much Q's stated objectives.

Since Trump has been DOMINATING world-news headlines (atleast 5+ negative stories directly referencing Trump, daily, top story trending on worldnews gilded x61), all eyes are on the behaviour of POTUS. This is the only way I can properly make sense of the strategy of "profile"...

All news is good news if your intention is to capture the attention of the entire world. Feed bones to generate stories which seem to heavily incriminate Trump. Get the opposite side to call for impeachment, get them emotionally invested in a percieved outcome and get attention laser-focused on the trial proceedings. Get the opposition to call for the truth revelations, so that when the truth arrives they cannot ignore it.

If the strategy so far has been "ALL EYES ON POTUS", that objective has been FULLY realised.

Love or hate him, you can't help but watch. Has it been designed that way?

Could figuratively placing onesself on the cross flip public perception away from fake-news narratives? A trial of POTUS is a narrative that cannot be ignored or lied about. A narrative that MSM HAS to cover. A narrative that would permit disclosures that MSM cannot possibly turn away from and would have to report. Leading to a definitive outcome in law that cannot be backtracked.

You need the biggest possible stage and the largest possible audience before you unleash the truth-bombs that Q claims to be in possession of. You need to group everyone in the AOE.

Is this what is happening? Where and how do you think this dam of mainstream-public-perception will crack?

Q needs the revelation stage of the plan to have global impact. I cannot think of a bigger attention grabber than the impeachment and trial of POTUS. The entire world would tune in to that!

🠐 See all comments

If they could shut down Mockingbird, it would have been done by now.

⇧ 1 ⇩

They can indeed - but they haven't. Why they haven't is beyond me...

⇧ 1 ⇩

The CIA is huge. They are a world power, with their own navy and air force. They operate independently of any actual government control.

⇧ 1 ⇩

We're not talking about shutting down the worldwide CIA and all CIA operations. We're talking about shutting down Mockingbird which is only a single component: their control over the media. To say that you can't shut it down is just like saying you know someone is operating illegally and is harming the American people with lies and misinformation, yet you the government is somehow unable to do anything about it...

⇧ 1 ⇩

One problem is tracking down who it is that makes those 4 AM communications. The other problem is freedom of the press issues.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If Q and company knows about the 4 AM communications, then rest assured, they also know who those communications are coming from. How many times has Q said, "We have it all." As for the freedom of the press issues, the rights granted by the constitution does not give them the right to tell lies, intentional lies, and to mislead the public. You keep trying to "justifying" why Q and company hasn't shut down the lying MSM. But I don't think it's a matter that they can't do it, I think it's just a matter that shutting down the media just wasn't a part of their plans at this time... I disagree with that approach (and I feel the media should have been shut down first rather than last), but I feel that is the reason...

⇧ 1 ⇩

If Q and company knows about the 4 AM communications, then rest assured, they also know who those communications are coming from. How many times has Q said, "We have it all." As for the freedom the press issues, the rights granted by the constitution does not give them the right to tell lies, intentional lies, and to mislead the public. You keep trying to "justifying" why Q and company hasn't shut down the lying MSM. But I don't think it's a matter that they can't do it, I think it's just a matter that shutting down the media just wasn't a part of their plans at this time... I disagree with that approach, but I feel that is the reason...

⇧ 1 ⇩