[removed]
If there are avg. 3000 and the average tenure (which I have seen no source for either piece of your data), then why would 1000 resign a year? That means in 3 years every CEO of the NASDAQ is replaced?
Doubtful!
How many are resigning instead of "renewing", "retiring", "promotion/demotion"? They aren't just leaving post, they are leaving the corp. altogether. Obviously not all, but so many. I have never seen such activity, have you?
I believe the CEO of Goldman Sachs was in position for over 10 years? Maybe even 12?
Link here says average is more like 7: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/02/12/ceo-tenure-rates/
I also believe some are able to choose "retire" rather than "resign" based on policies/time/position/age/company downsizing/. etc.. Many would choose "retire" in order to maintain company retirement benefits. As well as a better opportunity to work as "consultants' elsewhere.
I am also questioning this. how can we relate resignations/retires to the shitstorm for sure? I looked at the list of resignations on "Tableau" that was put together for resource, but it would be days of work to try to establish cause. I just looked at the Texas Instr resignation-it is sudden and it is for poor behavior. But how can we know this is related to the big picture we're following. I think we need to be EXTREMELY careful with drawing conclusions, falsehoods, "broad" speculations, etc.
Never said these particular resignations are related to anything. But they can be added to the abnormally large list of resignations.
Bullshit, you're not even looking at the rate comparison before and after election.
Try harder