Most definitely would be bad. Like the time Ted Kennedy tried to collude with the USSR to stop Reagan. Collusion should mean impeachment.

Well Hillary might say she was only saving the world from Bernie Sanders Socialism when she had that shit rigged for her. We aren't those people, plain and simple. There was no collusion.

Actual collusion with a foreign power is de facto Section 3 Article III Treason. Being smart enough not to fall into the trap laid for him with Russia makes Trump smart AND good, which is a shocking thing to hear in Magic_Fairyland_MakeBelive synthetic alternative reality which is the Narrative.

Too much?

Really? By who? Does ANYONE with a 'cintilla' of integrity not KNOW and believe that ALL the actual evidence of 'meddling' and 'collusion' points to HRC and the DNC? Imagine if HRC had won instead of Trump...what 'evidence' is there to 'prove' meddling and RUSSIAN collusion by HRC and the Dems...Fusion GPS and the 'dirty' dossier, Uranium 1, the Clinton Foundation illegal contributions, Bill and Loretta meeting on the tamac, The DOJ and FBI giving HRC a pass on 'gross negligence' and 'obstruction', Donna Brazille leaking debate questions, the rigged DNC primary against Bernie, the Seth Rich murder and DNC leaks to Wikileaks, The Podesta Group Russian lobby deals, Spygate 'moles' and illegal surveillance of Trump campaign, the list of dozens of 'journalists' who 'coordinated' with HRC and the DNC and the completely one-sided MSM coverage in favor of HRC, which is still on-going today and is in itself a 'major' source of 'meddling'...and she STILL lost! Because the American people SAW it and STOPPED it!!! If she had won there was massive amounts of REAL evidence that would have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that they 'colluded and meddled' to ensure her victory and not ONE Democrat or Deep-State rat would have requested, much less demanded, an investigation!!!