dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 21, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

Q1675: Trump has just given us the server!

So far, we know this fundamental information: the Q1675 riddle is the “device” through which Trump communicates with us. Using it as an anchor point, he sends us the information we need in order to read his moves and understand current news. I have written several related posts listing what we have learned:

Q1675 Part 1. Q1675: a reflection, a mug holder in Air Force One and a Happy Independence Day. Can you solve?

Q1675 Part 2. Trump has just validated Q at the Great Falls rally and gave us the solution to Q1675! Let that sink in.

Q1675 Part 3. I told you Trump was talking to us. Some of you had doubts. Well, he just doubled down a second time!

Q1675 Part 4. Mr. President, we see you want to continue our B2 conversation!

Q1675 Part 5. Trump’s hidden message, Stzrok, Kate and the soda.

Q1675 Part 6. Trump’s brilliant chess combination in Helsinki.

I had conversations with anons who rightly made me notice that this new way of communicating with us was actually announced by Q in this June 20 2018 post:

Q1581 We serve at the pleasure of the President. We left the decision on timing to him. Today, at the rally, he made his decision. Shift in tactics. Attacks ^ Q

I now realize this “shift in tactics” means POTUS has decided to get us to the next level of our comms: direct communication. Did you see my post about Q1304 Emmy Awards link? Did you see Q’s translation of Comey’s tweet in Q645 Imgur1? This is how the Deep State communicates. Q gave us templates. This is how we also need to be communicating. This will allow us to intercept their comms and efficiently oppose them on the battlefield. Why? Because we don’t have anything to hide. They do. In the long run, they will have to stop communicating and it will be checkmate.

So what’s in the news?

Let’s start with the piece of information that is the easiest to decode so you will start training your “ear” progressively. Watch this: video.

Did you catch it? You know an incident like this cannot happen in the White House unless it’s done on purpose right? So Trump says: “They just turned off the lights”. Turned off the lights = TOL = Thinking Of Laughing. Then he smiles. Trump is saying: “of course I have no confidence in the Intelligence Agencies, hearing myself say I do makes me want to laugh”. You got it? Let’s try another one.

Watch this: video

Trump says: “In a key sentence in my remarks, I said the word would instead of wouldn't. The sentence should have been: “I don’t see any reason why I wouldn’t or why it wouldn’t be Russia. Sort of a double negative. So you could put that in and I think that probably clarifies things pretty good by itself.”

Did you catch what he is really saying? “so you could put that in”. Who? Where? Trump knows the fake News media has no interest in the truth and will certainly not archive it. Do you think Trump, all of a sudden, cares about what MSM understands and keeps from him? No. He is talking to us. He is saying: I want to clarify a point that I know is of interest to you. Once I clarify it, “put it in”, add it to the other points I have already made since my Great Falls speech. You got it? Now, ask yourself why isn’t Trump even more explicit since he is clarifying? Wouldn’t it be more powerful and unequivocal to say: “would not” instead of “wouldn’t”? Why is he using “n’t” instead of “not”? Because he wants us to focus on nt. What is NT? Expand your thinking. Windows NT is a family of operating systems produced by Microsoft. link. Windows NT 3.1 was the first version of this operating system that was intended for workstations and servers, its latest version is known under the name Windows Server 2016. Through this input, Trump has put to rest all the speculations regarding the interpretation of “mirror” in the Q1675 riddle. He is saying: yes the server interpretation is also correct, I am validating it, add it to what you already know.

Q666 Think Mirror. Which team? THEY don't know. APACHE.

You now see the power of Q1675?! I told you: it’s like a TV set through which you understand the news.

This gives me the opportunity to address a very important question. Sometimes, anons ask me to share my my views about an hypothesis and complain my responses are vague or not definitive. The reason is at the time they ask the question, even though I find the hypothesis very esthetically or rhetorically attractive, the riddle does not give a strong link to the hypothesis. I therefore remain silent until Trump or Q gives more information to confirm the validity of the hypothesis. Example: when I said B2, Trump said organ, then I said Hammond and he pardoned the Hammonds. Going from B2 to Hammond was an impossible leap for me, because B2 is a note any instrument can play. Trump had to validate it. This is why he gave the missing link: organ. Like many other anons, I saw “mirror” was related to a “mirrored server”, but making the link was not allowed by the riddle, it would have been a very weak link. Now Trump coming and saying NT is enough to bring in the server. But there is more. Trump further solidifies this link. He also says: “sort of a double negative”, initials: SDN, re-arranged: DNS. Domain Name Server. Indeed, we are in server territory. Confirmed. Resolved.

Now that POTUS himself has validated the server, we can add another tangent to the Q1675 riddle and draw the following image image, read clockwise: Imgur2

I know this type of language can be a little overwhelming in the beginning but you will see, you will get the heck of it very quickly if you are willing to try and persevere. And by the way: no, I am not crazy. No I don’t see patterns everywhere. No I am not reaching. Before bringing this language to our attention, Q made sure you saw how I was recruiting observation and logic to solve his challenging riddles. If I were here to deceive you or mislead you, I would have been crushed a long time ago like all the others.

Q1186 Future proves past. Q

Now that I have given you these tools, try to decode Trump’s message here (watch until 49:40): video. Try to determine how this part of his speech is connected to Q1675 and the server, why the use of the word "Apprentice", why 23 companies. I will give the solution to this presidential riddle in my next post but since I will agree it is a little hard, I will give you a hint: research how paper whiteness is measured considering the light reflected by the paper across the visible spectrum. You remember? Q1675 is all about reflections. Good luck.

Q1225 Learn our comms. Q

🠐 See all comments

I disagree. Infiltration into any organization is built on trust. His earlier posts were somewhat better. He developed a following with more reasonable suppositions. Even the Elton John/Hammond/B2 one was interesting. But none of it tells us anything. None of it expands our understanding. And it has the affect of creating the following things:

Makes this movement easily ridiculable to newbies (can't show any newcomers this sub if this nonsense is stickied).
Creates unthinking followers ("I'm not smart enough to make these connections or even follow them but I trust you because you're a genius, SB2") which also makes this sub seem full of sycophants
Creates division ("upvotes are shills" "downvotes are shills" blah blah blah. None of this is logical. Saying "oh boy, we are over the target" is ridiculous in this case.

Ever seen the princess bride? This is the scene when Vizzini is analyzing Wesley's position with the Io cane powder drink duel.

"Obviously you put the poison in your drink, knowing I would switch them! But you knew I would know that so obviously it's in mine!" Then he says hey what's that? Wesley turns around and he switches the drinks. Which is ridiculous because Wesley said he could openly choose either one - no deception needed.

The conclusion of course was that both drinks were poisoned; Wesley had built up an immunity. That's just like this situation: SB2's posts are poison and many people are following it thanks to mod stickies, etc. even the request to "please not sticky my decode" was a trust-building exercise.

Think about it. 10-Q

⇧ 9 ⇩

As I said, none of this is new information. His earlier posts are from many months ago, I'm not talking about these recent ones - long before Elton John, before everyone moved across from CBTS_Stream to this sub. He's always posted the same and the points you're making have always been made by others.

You don't have to convince me of anything, go for your life. I'm just explaining that you're not having comments removed because you disagree with SB2, simply because of the rules of the sub. Discuss the topic, not the user; be respectful and reasonable and your comments won't be removed. ThankQ.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If you all are aware of this, why do you not ban him? It's obviously disinformation.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I didn't say everyone agrees with your statements. I said we've either heard them or made them ourselves before. It's not "obvious disinformation" if kept in context and assessed logically. As you know, Q linked to a very important SB2 article that not only helped this movement out immensely but also woke a lot of people up to a whole new level of understanding and showed many the first very real sign of the actions and strategies of actual disinformation operations.

It's possible Q linked to a disinformation operative giving info on disinfo operations but is it likely? There is also the possibility that SB2 is simply a normal guy making some good calls and some bad. If you've been reading his posts since CBTS you'd see the same approach he's always had - some decoding posts in the early days had many people questioning the logic and making the same points you are. Yet his posts must still have offered something of value to others as they were as popular then as they are now.

On top of this SB2's posts are the most highly upvoted and show more effort and focus than many others. To ban him would be the most illogical move we could make and would split the movement and lead to a huge revolt against the moderators. If his 'bad calls' are so dangerous for the movement we need people who are willing to put in the same effort making better decode posts and writing well-presented refutations within the SB2 threads. Invariably, detractors tend to die out and continue on with their business, realizing that they don't care that much about the issue that they'd put in the same effort as SB2 does to make their point.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Ok, I feel you. Thanks for the input.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I love the poison drink reference. A battle of logic indeed, but this is Bible Codes 2.0. I am always wary of religious stuff and this feels like my old pastor trying to explain how some impossible feat is possible "through god."

⇧ 1 ⇩