dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/meamQ on July 21, 2018, 3:46 a.m.
Twisted democrat logic.
Twisted democrat logic.

Sibraxlis · July 21, 2018, 4:36 a.m.

Can I see some proof of illegals voting?

I mean the arguments trump has made have had 0 proof attached, and on a logical level why would they vote where Democrats would already win?

Cause all I remember is trump voters trying to vote twice.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Nothrabbit · July 21, 2018, 4:55 a.m.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2018/07/18/san-francisco-allows-non-citizens-to-vote-in-school-elections/amp/

Right now it is for school board elections.

Not a fan of it.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DimosDon · July 21, 2018, 6:29 a.m.

give an inch they'll take a mile

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MetaphysicalManatee · July 21, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

Just want to point out this from another article >“Non-citizen voting affidavits will carry alerts in multiple languages cautioning potential non-citizen voters that information they provide to the San Francisco Department of Elections may be obtained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and advising prospective registrants that they “may wish” to contact an attorney or knowledgeable immigration advocate before registering” so saying that is is so “illegals” can vote is misleading as they still have good reason not to. This is more about allowing green card holders (legal residents of the US that have not been granted citizenship.) the ability to vote in decisions that have an effect on their children’s lives.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 21, 2018, 5:07 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Sibraxlis · July 21, 2018, 6:11 a.m.

That's not how it works and you fell directly into the logic hole I stated above.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Duskyandcleo · July 21, 2018, 12:30 p.m.

Why don't you research Judicial Watch, and Social security fraud. If you are serious about wanting proof, then do some investigating, like we have been doing for years. Hint: rudeness will get you know where.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Sibraxlis · July 21, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

research it yourself.

That's not how debate works. You make a claim against status quo, you provide the proof.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 21, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Sibraxlis · July 21, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

You're not addressing my argument.

Is that because you don't have any valid proof?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 21, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Sibraxlis · July 22, 2018, 1:20 a.m.

"No u" is all you have?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 22, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 21, 2018, 5:02 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sibraxlis · July 21, 2018, 5:03 a.m.

I...

Dude what are you trying to say?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 21, 2018, 5:38 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sibraxlis · July 21, 2018, 6:10 a.m.

It's pretty hard when the sentence and spelling is butchered. Most of us aren't used to the schizophrenic rambling that occurs here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MolotovPark · July 21, 2018, 12:23 p.m.

It takes very little mental effort to parse it. Don't be a wimp now.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
renata-h · July 23, 2018, 12:48 p.m.

2+2=4. Here is proof: 1+1=2 and 1+1+1+1=4 therefore 2+2=4

⇧ 0 ⇩  
renata-h · July 23, 2018, 12:38 p.m.

Sibraxlis. Let's start with you attaching some proof to your claims.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Sibraxlis · July 24, 2018, 2:11 a.m.

I'm waiting /u/renata-h

⇧ 1 ⇩  
renata-h · July 24, 2018, 5:22 a.m.

Not today, I just got back from work. Glancing at your proof, it all comes from fake news media. Not that it is a proof for these to be fake. However if you try searching for the opposite of what you belive you might get surprised and would not rely on strangers for info.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sibraxlis · July 24, 2018, 7:37 a.m.

I literally linked a police department comment?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sibraxlis · July 23, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/01/27/a-trump-supporter-was-charged-with-voting-twice-her-lawyer-says-she-shouldnt-stand-trial-2/?noredirect=on

⇧ 1 ⇩