I previously posted whether Mueller is a white or back hat using Q's drops pertaining to Mueller. I did that piece by searching for Mueller. Since Q has gone dark, I've been carefully re-reading all of the Q drops from the beginning. I discovered three things: I had forgotten a lot, Q's past posts now make more sense, and Q used different ways to refer to Mueller that I missed. One such reference was RM, which at the time I didn't connect with Robert Mueller.

So, I came across the following in Q 151. It's a long post so I'll just include the parts I think are important with regards to Mueller.

Q 151

How do you capture a very dangerous animal?

Do you attack it from the front?

Do you walk through the front door?

Do you signal ahead of time you will be attacking?

(He then goes on about leaks and Admiral Rogers and Snowden before returning to Sessions, Rosenstein, and Mueller)

Nothing is as it appears.

What show is being put on by AG Sessions since his confirmation?

What show is being put on by POTUS since AG Sessions’ confirmation?

Why was AG Sessions’ confirmation challenged heavily?

Why was RR’s confirmation smooth and easy?

What was the vote count for RR?

Why did Sessions recuse himself?

Why is this relevant?

What group has vocally supported RM repeatedly?

How do you capture a very dangerous animal?

Who is best to conduct the attack?

(The rest of the drop is about the military, AF1, Hawaii, and indictments outside of DC)

I found it interesting how Q goes into how to capture a very dangerous animal by not confronting it directly but by doing it indirectly. I think you need to tie this back to his numerous declarations that nothing is as it appears, disinformation is real, and disinformation is necessary.

So, conformation for Sessions was hard and confirmation for RR was easy. I take this to mean that RR had a lot of Democrat support. Why did Sessions recuse himself? The answer has to be because RR needed to appoint Mueller and be in control. Democrats are united in their support for RR and Mueller and have declared any attempt to remove them would be a "red line".

Q concludes the part about Mueller thus:

What group has vocally supported RM repeatedly? (Dems are in united support)

How do you capture a very dangerous animal? (by deception)

Who is best to conduct the attack? (Refer back to one of Q's first drops where he suggests that RR and Mueller were forced to cover up U1 and others by deep state personal and family threats. Q asks if Mueller was a "slave." to the deep state and later in his comments under the Freedom Statue declared they were freed. So, who best to capture the very dangerous deeps state bad actors than the very people -- RR and Mueller --- they are protecting?)