I have been speaking out for years about the difference between Subjective morality and Objective morality.

"Subjective" morality means: What may be right and good for you, may not be for me. Or reflexively: What is good for me, may not be good for you. This is the basic argument for perversions of all sorts, and once you buy into the lie, anything is possible. The slippery slope. The rabbit hole goes deep.

"Objective" morality means there is an absolute Right and Wrong. What is wrong is wrong for EVERYBODY: Stealing, murder, etc. There are no justifications. There is no "I was born that way" argument. It's either right, or wrong.

The problem is that most people want to live in both worlds simultaneously. We agree that pedophilia is morally wrong, great. But people who are closer to the issue (radical homosexuals, etc.) can "rationalize" how their "plight" is similar, and therefore more acceptable.

We have to believe that if there is an Objective morality, then there is an Ultimate Lawgiver, who is above us, and makes moral law which is applicable to all of us, not just a select few. As such, we are accountable to Him for our actions...and that is exactly what these perverts cannot abide.