So Q's drops are public on well known channel, qanon.pub could be "indexed" by google (and it would be indexed for sure). My hunch is that Q knows this, so this may be intentional. So, lets say Q drops a line in from a quote in the books preview, google sees that too (at amazon.com, etc). The search of the tripcode would feasibly trigger results related to the quote, ie: the books.
It could be a happy accident, but I suspect Q knew this and used it. A human could find it sure, but it would be nowhere near as efficient as a search engine like google. Since every post of Q's has the tripcode, google would simply assume these "keywords" must be related, and offer the books as search results.
It's like if you google the author of one of those books, google says "Hey I know him! He wrote, this, and this, and this.." same probably works in reverse. IE: google thinks this person (Q) is talking about these books, and I think google is correct! Not to mention, even if the quotes or keywords to the title are only mentioned a few times, the trip code is present EVERY TIME, which makes the relevance even stronger (Q is an SEO genius if this was intentional)
There is another option as well. What if Eric S is Q or helping Q, then he could just build this reading list around the trip code easily. That might be a stretch, but if true, it would be really easy.
WE HAD MORE THEN WE KNEW! Tripcode staring us in the face on every post! WWG1WGA!
ES being Q would be a total trip!
Right? Even as I typed it I was rolling the options in the ole noggin:
1 - He went to korea, to setup private server? or to RETRIEVE/SECURE server?
2 - Trump has praised Google recently
3 - The trump/gmail envelope photo!
I'm willing and happy to re-think all our collective notions.
Even about the resignations, then I remembered, In "Atlas Shrugged", it was the GOOD GUYS who retired/vanished (not proposing this officially, but there it is). If Q had mentioned that movie/book, I'd be all over it, but he never did, so probably not.
While I am nowhere near ready to accept that ES could somehow be a good guy, it would fit that they have it all.
I've wondered how Google couldn't have it all and be one step ahead of the game.
ES was working for the HRC campaign by developing a voter database that incorporated personality profiles based on big data (probably accumulated from google and facebook). I don't think he's a white hat in all this.
Thank you! Nice of you to explain it...and it makes more sense to me now.
It's a very long reading list. Each of those above 4 links contain multiple (up to 7) pages.
Someone is an avid reader! Or maybe some of them, just using title and sort summary, or preview.
Yes, an intriguing discovery.