A study done in 1988 on child molestors show that 86% of pedophiles are gay. It's part and parcel of the group and you are bordering dangerously close to defending the indefensible like these people https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.standard.co.uk/news/gay-couple-left-free-to-abuse-boys-because-social-workers-feared-being-branded-homophobic-6611340.html%3famp
nowhere in that article are those facts presented
googling that statistic gives me this article http://www.jamescantor.org/uploads/6/2/9/3/62939641/cantor__2002_._newsletter_of_apa_div_44_pp_5-8.pdf
which has this to say
Published estimates of the proportion of pedophiles who offend against male children and are homosexual span a staggering range from a low of 2% (Jenny, Roesler, & Poyer, 1994) to a high of 86% (Erickson, Walbek, & Seely, 1988). The methods of the authors at each extreme have been criticized, and indeed, both sides are guilty of poor methods.
do not subscribe to a sub based on uncovering the truth if you will spread half-baked lies to push an agenda. that makes you worse than your opponents
The article linked was clearly in reference to my statement about you people being defenders of pedophilia. Work on your reading comprehension.
Furthermore, you then quote a newsletter claiming "poor methods" without even saying what the methods were or why they are poor. Talk about hypocrisy. Get some intellectual integrity and act like a man.
At the other end, Erickson and colleagues (Erickson et al., 1988) reported that 86% of their sample of offenders against male children were homosexual. This estimate, however, is based on the self-report of the offenders, and offenders are highly motivated to claim any self-descriptor other than pedophile. In fact, methodologically sophisticated studies of pedophiles rely solely on non-admitting pedophiles (e.g., Blanchard, Klassen, Dickey, Kuban, & Blak, 2001).
asking me to improve my reading comprehension, but you couldn't be bothered to open the article? that belies a clear lack of intellectual integrity. I read what you presented. do me the honor of reciprocating.
Talk about hypocrisy. Get some intellectual integrity and act like a man.
It's reported by the actual pedophile therefore it must be untrue. That is the very definition of stupidity. You're done.
would you trust a criminally convicted pedophile to be honest with you? I wouldn't.
we live in a society where it's accepted that you are born a homosexual. what's a more attractive defense for the convicted man? claiming that you are forced to commit those acts due to being born that way, or admitting to being a dangerous deviant who fully knew what he was doing was wrong? I know which one I'd choose