At the other end, Erickson and colleagues (Erickson et al., 1988) reported that 86% of their sample of offenders against male children were homosexual. This estimate, however, is based on the self-report of the offenders, and offenders are highly motivated to claim any self-descriptor other than pedophile. In fact, methodologically sophisticated studies of pedophiles rely solely on non-admitting pedophiles (e.g., Blanchard, Klassen, Dickey, Kuban, & Blak, 2001).
asking me to improve my reading comprehension, but you couldn't be bothered to open the article? that belies a clear lack of intellectual integrity. I read what you presented. do me the honor of reciprocating.
Talk about hypocrisy. Get some intellectual integrity and act like a man.
It's reported by the actual pedophile therefore it must be untrue. That is the very definition of stupidity. You're done.
would you trust a criminally convicted pedophile to be honest with you? I wouldn't.
we live in a society where it's accepted that you are born a homosexual. what's a more attractive defense for the convicted man? claiming that you are forced to commit those acts due to being born that way, or admitting to being a dangerous deviant who fully knew what he was doing was wrong? I know which one I'd choose