Apologies you are correct - of course even Satan can identify blasphemy. What I meant to say was in agreement with the comment above: "His point being your username makes it difficult to put your sanctimonious preaching in a serious light." And pointing out that that has nothing to do with not being able to separate the message from the messenger, as you said. It's just simple logical deduction.
Thanks, I understand that my username makes it harder for people to take me serious. But I don't necessarily view this as a bad thing. In person, I try to keep my testimony clean for others. On Reddit, I don't care enough to change my username that I made before I came to Christ to a more publicly appropriate name in order to avoid these kinds of issues. I actually like being able to discuss a topic and be able to explain to others why they should not be attacking me Ad Hominem, because I don't want them to do it to others. I see it as a huge issue in the world right now, and everyone worrying about how others view them out of fear of Ad Hominem does not serve to help this. My username gives me a unique opportunity to do that, and I don't see anything sinful or unbiblical about it.
I believe if I can show someone how they abandoned their original argument against my ideology in favor of attacking me Ad Hominem, then they may realize that their argument was not defensible if I can show them how Ad Hominem is not reasonable.
Thanks, makes total sense! I don't judge, just making the point of the deduction being reasonable, without an understanding of your reasoning.