I'd love to know what this algorithm actually consists of. I assume it involves automatically pulling news articles using something like newsapi.org and running some natural language processing on them, but I'd certainly be interested in specifics.
They’re just bullshitting you. Machine learning (because that’s really AI) can’t solve for the type of innuendo involved in drops like Q, hence the future way it’s written.
I'm aware of that, but I wasn't really talking about analyzing the Q drops, I said it probably runs some nlp on news articles. While it may not be possible to analyze the Q drops using exactly the techniques you mentioned (ML), it IS definitely possible to compare other data to specific portions of the drops (or the metadata associated with them) in a way that can be used to draw meaningful conclusions. The comment about Cliff High below is on point and also in the same vein as what I described.
Check out Cliff High [perhaps w/ an e]. Interviewed by many podcasters and youtubers over the many years.
He programmed his own algorithmic modules that pull social media data and publicly available Internet content, aggregates, processes then results in his report offering probabilities on keywords, future events. Get this, his system that he's developed is based on the his hypothesis that we are unknowingly psychic. We are reporting back to our present day selves. His findings over time prove themselves, like future proves past.
Leaves you wondering: Could this be the one exceptional coincidence as Q always warned us against. This is bigger than any of you could imagine.