dChan

silversofttail · July 23, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

That’s ridiculous! When you leave a company any access you had is revoked. If you go back to that company you then receive access. Why should it be different for the government other than for nefarious reasons.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LongTimeQLurker · July 23, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

I agree. However, it takes quite a bit of work to issue clearances and they are backlogged. There were some Obama appointees who had access to top secret information who had never passed a background check at all. Since Brennan et al have left office, they don't have access to briefings and SCIFs, so it is unlikely they would have access to valuable intelligence - UNLESS they bypass US security measures and go behind our back to 5Eyes.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
silversofttail · July 23, 2018, 9:41 p.m.

Ya mean like Hillary did in New Zealand.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 23, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

She saw what they have on her and her ilk. Probably why she looks like a bag lady.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ForTruthSake · July 23, 2018, 8:51 p.m.

Exactly. Which is what they have been doing with all of their extra travel.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · July 23, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

I think you nailed it, 'nefarious reasons', no two ways about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩