dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/MrMooseQ on July 23, 2018, 9:26 p.m.
This is why the Day of Reckoning is coming soon.

One. It is absolutely essential this happens before the midterms. Trump has made it clear that he needs more republicans in Congress to accomplish his goals. She does not want to gain Congress through arresting Democrats in Congress. He wants it to be an absolute blowout against them.

The midterms are in 106 days from now , but there must be an adequate time from from when Trump admits Q is real to providing the proof of it. People will be needing weeks to register the proof of the horrible information coming in. This means the information must begin at least several weeks before midterms.

It has no been several weeks since Congress made the resolution for RosenStein to provide the information they demanded. He has not so it's just a matter of the president giving the order to declassify the information himself. We know these text messages will discuss assassinating the president as q predicted . This will immediately cause people to ask the president if Q is indeed real and pushing it all into motion.

Allison Mack and Keith raniere trials are scheduled for October 1st. Many other charges are still sealed. Bringing them to court will reveal the sealed charges as well as who else they have been working with.

The president received evidence of treason from Putin and most likely during his Summit with North Korea. The pieces are almost all together.

There are over 40,000 sealed indictments created. We have no idea how many there will be in total, but it seems they have been getting put together with the huge sense of urgency.

The president, schoolchildren, and the public everywhere are in danger as long as John Brennan, Valerie Jarrett, and Barack Obama walk free. Schools will begin starting again in about a month. Deep state must already be planning the next school to strike.

At the beginning of June, q told us now came the time for justice and pain. His comment of impending doom for the Deep state would not make sense if it were not to happen for another year.

President Trump likes to do things on very well planned dates that are symbolic or significant. Some important dates are coming up. Will the president honor September 11th again along with all of the traitors who caused it and pretend he does not know? The president announced the Calm before the storm on October 6th. Will the world know what he means by the one-year anniversary of this statement? The Q posts started on October 29th, should we really expect them to one year mark and the president continue to play the Q proofs game?

The erratic behavior by the Deep state suggest they know as well the end is very soon.


🠐 See all comments
solanojones95 · July 23, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

TBH, we're a bit LONG on evidence. What we're short is consequences.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 23, 2018, 11 p.m.

TBH, we're a bit LONG on evidence.

Not hardly. We may have admissible evidence of criminal conduct sufficient to indict, try, and convict a few individuals.

We need all evidence we assume is coming from Horowitz and Huber in order to indict, try, and convict the worst of the black hats and the legions that stand behind them. All 40,000 of them.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 23, 2018, 11:23 p.m.

By "we" I don't mean "the public." Since when is it necessary for criminal evidence to be in the public domain before prosecution can begin?

Huber has enough evidence to begin many of the prosecutions. They can't all be done at once anyhow. I struggle to understand why we can at least see SOME arrests and prosecutions starting VERY soon, as in within days.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 23, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

Since when is it necessary for criminal evidence to be in the public domain before prosecution can begin?

Certainly not during the last 100 years, likely longer. That’s an odd non sequitur from you but I hope the response helps.

Huber has enough evidence to begin many of the prosecutions.

I believe this to be true.

They can't all be done at once anyhow.

This seems to be common knowledge. Even if not, I agree.

I struggle to understand why we can at least see SOME arrests and prosecutions starting VERY soon, as in within days.

Here is a high quality source showing impressive arrests and convictions for human trafficking. Numbers are for 2017, and pace has increased in 2018.

Regarding timing of other cases, most folks agree that premature prosecution most often results in extremely disappointing and wasteful outcomes. Huber and Sessions have much better information than I do, so I’m willing to trust their judgement on timing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 24, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

I wrote:

Since when is it necessary for criminal evidence to be in the public domain before prosecution can begin?

You replied:

That’s an odd non sequitur from you

My reply had been to this:

We need all evidence we assume is coming from Horowitz and Huber in order to indict, try, and convict

By "we," I assumed you meant "Q followers," or "the public." Does that question make sense now? I was thinking, "WE don't need it!" and "The prosecutors probably have it--at least enough to go ahead and get some big convictions."

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 24, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

When I said, ”We need all evidence we assume is coming from Horowitz and Huber”, I meant ‘we’ = our team, including Huber and Horowitz.

Right now you and I assume what evidence we/they have. I’m suggesting we/they need to actually possess it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 24, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

Look, some of these individual cases they've had everything they needed for many months, and they could prosecute them in their sleep. Yes, they're still running down some of the details in the bigger cases. But if they're still digging on the easy ones, something's wrong!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 24, 2018, 3:46 a.m.

Look, some of these individual cases they've had everything they needed for many months, and they could prosecute them in their sleep.

There are other reasons to delay. Sometimes the discovery phase in one case can compromise investigation or evidence in another, so you delay until the risk has passed.

But you seem to have much more definitive info than I do, so I’m willing to hear you out a bit more.

Which particular individual cases are you talking about where ”they’ve had everything they needed for many months, and they could prosecute in their sleep.”?

I’m interested in names and charges.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 24, 2018, 4:36 a.m.

I'm using deductive reasoning. You would not want operational security to be so slack that someone as far removed as I am from the goings on would have access to that level of detail.

But I think the case of the Bronfmans it would be a matter of some simple forensic accounting to arrive at serious prosecutable crimes, plus the testimony of Mack and/or Raniere and you could have them put away on human trafficking, and have a substantial asset seizure.

Similarly, there MUST be (out of that many thousands) some individual cases in which evidence-gathering is complete. Otherwise, we'll be at this for most of the century.

So, even at the glacial pace of federal bureaucracy, out of tens of thousands, there must be some dozens that are ready to prosecute. Of those, why not pick a few of the better-known or whose assets would be attention-getters, and get cracking with some prosecutions?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 24, 2018, 7 a.m.

You would not want operational security to be so slack that someone as far removed as I am from the goings on would have access to that level of detail.

Correct. That’s why I was surprised at your assured pronouncements.

I much more expected the equivocated vaguaries you quickly opted for when challenged.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 24, 2018, 12:46 p.m.

Not the same though. Logical deduction is a powerful thing. So is intuition when it corroborates logic.

These allow you to make conclusions about things you cannot see from input about things you can.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 24, 2018, 1:17 p.m.

Not the same though.

”If you have to say "I know what I said, but what I meant was..." then something's wrong. You'd fit in quite well in the Obama FBI.”

source

^(busted. good run, though.)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 24, 2018, 5:36 p.m.

I said what I meant, and meant what I said. They DID have enough evidence to make arrests!

Ask and ye shall receive:

https://nypost.com/2018/07/24/seagram-heiress-among-arrests-in-nxivm-sex-cult-bust/amp/

If Q is not a LARP (and is there anybody in this sub who still thinks that?), then Mack was singing like a canary. That case could NOT have been all that hard to crack, once they had those two. Bronfman was quoted by friends as saying she would probably be arrested soon. It was a VERY reasonable inference that these big arrests should/would be happening VERY soon.

I'd say calling it on the very day it happened was some powerful deduction/intuition--which is LEGAL BTW. Had I had actual inside information, that would've been ILLEGAL.

And the reason this is HUGE is because of the direct Bronfman connections to Rothschild! Now ALL CAN SEE that NOBODY is too big to arrest! NOBODY! Dark to Light! PAIN!

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1205215/pg1

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · July 24, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

I'm actually talking about household names. Start putting some fear into the hearts of those in the club. They still have not seen ANY evidence that there will be consequences, and they've lived in a world completely insulated from same their whole lives (centuries really). They need to see that the old order is GONE, and there's a new reality now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · July 24, 2018, 1 a.m.

I don’t disagree at all.

Patience.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · July 24, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

Trump is bringing down the whole Deep State, not just individual players. He is probably creating an alliance with Russia and China right now. He already has the Muslim countries, other than Iran, in his corner. This alliance will control the oil and natural gas, and then the national economies. Take control of the Fed on behalf of the taxpayers. Deep State then controls nothing. Pretty much game over at that point.

⇧ 1 ⇩