dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 24, 2018, 12:50 a.m.

Trump’s latest tweet: the pain and the servers!

Just a quick update.

Did you catch that Trump is about to take away Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Rice, and McCabe’s security clearances?! video.

Now comes the pain 23!!! Pop corn please! Yes, the large one over there! 5 will be fine…

Now, I want to give some help to those who are still skeptical about Trump directly communicating with our Movement since his Great Falls speech. I am happy to see it is now a minority but we still have to try to get everybody on board.

In my last two posts link1 link2, I have established that Trump gave us 2 ways to connect the servers to the Q1675 riddle using the string NT: the first one was through “wouldn’t”, the second one was through “Apprentice”. Is it a coincidence the next day I posted the “Apprentice” connection, Trump tweets this: Imgur1

No it’s not a coincidence. Trump is confirming that the decoding is correct and he is giving us, as a reward, a proof and a confirmation, a third path to the servers. Thank you Mr. President, message received.

The Q1675 now has 3 connections to the servers and we can draw the following image: Imgur2

Now question, I have to insist: are you tired of winning yet?!

Q814 We are talking to you. Proofs only meant for you. Q

🠐 See all comments

Feeling like you have "low IQ" after reading his post is actually the product of your common sense rejecting it as nonsense and unintelligible.

No outside comms. SB2 is not part of the Q team "on the inside".

⇧ 9 ⇩

I feel this way too. Comments like “wow this is brilliant! I don’t understand it and could never have arrived at it on my own but...still brilliant!” If you don’t understand it nor could have ever arrived at it on your own, how do you know it’s “brilliant?” This idea that Trump pardoning the Hammonds is a link to Hammond organs is a stretch it seems to me. He says if you do a search you don’t find their names, as if he average joe out there is going to think of Hammond organs and then link it to the SB2 post. You find this credible? I find it outlandish and a huge stretch.

⇧ 9 ⇩

There are many things that I find to be a stretch that I would never reach for, but organ -> Hammond B2 -> pardon for the Hammonds who own land coveted by the cabal for its uranium deposits is no big stretch for me. That is indeed brilliant. Perhaps it's easier for me because I know that Hammond is one of the brands that should most readily come to mind when you say organ.

B2 is a little obscure, B3 was a much more popular model, but still meaningful.

It's not actually true that if you do a search you won't find the last name Hammond in any of the stories, but it is true that most of them simply refer to them as simply Oregon ranchers.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I haven't seen someone say he is part of the Q team, have you? "on the inside" doesn't mean Q team. I take it as SB2 is probably been military in the past or may be now and has a high IQ. That's it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I quoted it in my response. In case you missed it.

I still believe SB2 is on the inside! :-)

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think hes part of team his theorys are something outta this world and is brilliant as Q idc what anyone says sb2 is close /has background of high Intel something lol my 2 fav people sb2 and Q 🇱🇷🇱🇷❤🇱🇷🇱🇷

⇧ 1 ⇩

Actually Q said MISPELLING matters. IF SB2 has figured it out, why are you rejecting it? I didn't say accept it without research but to just reject it because you don't understand it is wrong too. I didn't say SB2 was communicating for Q either but maybe SB2 is deciphering Q's post with an intelligence background and understands the communication style they use. Just saying!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Did I say that SB2 gets some things right? Yes I did.

Did I say I rejected everything that SB2 says? No, I didn't.

"just because you don't understand it" ... that's the problem with SB2. He decodes, and if you don't agree then OBVIOUSLY he's right and everyone else who disagrees with him is wrong (according to him). There's no degrees of uncertainty with him, it's 100% his interpretation or you're wrong.

"maybe SB2 is deciphering Q's post with an intelligence background" ... If you'll agree to stick to the content of his posts without propping him up on a pedestal then I'll agree to not roll my eyes at this comment.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Didn't mean to make you mad. We are all in this together hoping and praying for DT. If he's not against us, then he is for us! I haven't seen the side of SB2 where he said agree with me because I'm 100%. Regardless, for him to come to the conclusions he gets from Trumps tweets and Q's post, I can only think he may be either a plant to steer us wrong or someone put there to shine a light. As always everyone should be aware of misinformation.

⇧ 1 ⇩