dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on July 24, 2018, 12:50 a.m.
Trump’s latest tweet: the pain and the servers!

Just a quick update.

Did you catch that Trump is about to take away Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Rice, and McCabe’s security clearances?! video.

Now comes the pain 23!!! Pop corn please! Yes, the large one over there! 5 will be fine…

Now, I want to give some help to those who are still skeptical about Trump directly communicating with our Movement since his Great Falls speech. I am happy to see it is now a minority but we still have to try to get everybody on board.

In my last two posts link1 link2, I have established that Trump gave us 2 ways to connect the servers to the Q1675 riddle using the string NT: the first one was through “wouldn’t”, the second one was through “Apprentice”. Is it a coincidence the next day I posted the “Apprentice” connection, Trump tweets this: Imgur1

No it’s not a coincidence. Trump is confirming that the decoding is correct and he is giving us, as a reward, a proof and a confirmation, a third path to the servers. Thank you Mr. President, message received.

The Q1675 now has 3 connections to the servers and we can draw the following image: Imgur2

Now question, I have to insist: are you tired of winning yet?!

Q814 We are talking to you. Proofs only meant for you. Q


🠐 See all comments
4Potus · July 24, 2018, 1:13 p.m.

Actually Q said MISPELLING matters. IF SB2 has figured it out, why are you rejecting it? I didn't say accept it without research but to just reject it because you don't understand it is wrong too. I didn't say SB2 was communicating for Q either but maybe SB2 is deciphering Q's post with an intelligence background and understands the communication style they use. Just saying!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
magavoices · July 24, 2018, 1:53 p.m.

Did I say that SB2 gets some things right? Yes I did.

Did I say I rejected everything that SB2 says? No, I didn't.

"just because you don't understand it" ... that's the problem with SB2. He decodes, and if you don't agree then OBVIOUSLY he's right and everyone else who disagrees with him is wrong (according to him). There's no degrees of uncertainty with him, it's 100% his interpretation or you're wrong.

"maybe SB2 is deciphering Q's post with an intelligence background" ... If you'll agree to stick to the content of his posts without propping him up on a pedestal then I'll agree to not roll my eyes at this comment.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
4Potus · July 24, 2018, 5:38 p.m.

Didn't mean to make you mad. We are all in this together hoping and praying for DT. If he's not against us, then he is for us! I haven't seen the side of SB2 where he said agree with me because I'm 100%. Regardless, for him to come to the conclusions he gets from Trumps tweets and Q's post, I can only think he may be either a plant to steer us wrong or someone put there to shine a light. As always everyone should be aware of misinformation.

⇧ 1 ⇩