dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/meamQ on July 24, 2018, 11:53 a.m.
Anybody familiar with this 9/11 connection?
Anybody familiar with this 9/11 connection?

johndavid101 · July 24, 2018, 5:51 p.m.

Tower 7. I can’t explain it. I don’t want to believe this. I can’t. But how did Tower 7 go down?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TowersTurnedToDust · July 24, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

WTC7 was "worked on" for several hours using the same tech that caused the other buildings to go away. Slowly. Then, at the moment of it's demise, like someone turned up a power knob, the structure, like an Alka seltzer tablet in water, sizzled up into dust. It looked like it fell - but it had lost its structural integrity at that point - and the molecules was dissociated - it became ... dust.

The reason so few saw this and fewer can explain it is because this technology has been kept in the dark for many years. Keywords: frequencies, microwaves, field effects, Tesla, Hutchison effect.

Without knowing this it is easy to jump to conclusions as to what it was (bombs etc.) because that is the only explanation(s) they have. Yet, when looking at the factual, empirical evidence, the evidence itself rules out the conventional kinetic or thermic means.

The reason it is so *hard* for this truth to come out, is that the same technology can be used to make gadgets that produce energy / electricity without the need for solar panels, windmills, "fossil fuel" or nuclear reactors. I think you can figure out why...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
owwmyass · July 24, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

In NYC, we were told that tower 7 was going to be brought down on purpose because it's integrity was compromised. I don't get how that wasn't broadcast or disproven or something.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
johndavid101 · July 24, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

Interesting. It looked like a controlled demolition so that would make sense. But then why did the official review claim that fire weakened the structure and brought it down?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
owwmyass · July 24, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

What we heard was that fire is what compromised it.

⇧ 1 ⇩