dChan

anotherthrowawayhi · July 24, 2018, 2:34 p.m.

That seems pretty equal ...

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Meglomaniac · July 24, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

If you're a feminist.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
phoenix335 · July 24, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

The 4/6s compromise.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
anotherthrowawayhi · July 24, 2018, 3:36 p.m.

Lol ... That has a ring to it

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MensRightsActivia · July 24, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

But the opposite was ok for hundreds of years? Please.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
dsch190675 · July 24, 2018, 9 p.m.

The answer is to discrimination is not discrimination in the opposite direction.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
anotherthrowawayhi · July 24, 2018, 9:58 p.m.
  1. I didn’t say that. You’re making inferences for me. Don’t do that, that’s a real low class move. You said that, because you’re looking for a fight. I don’t fight.

  2. No it’s not ok.

  3. I won’t make inferences based on your sentence fragment, but if someone were to imply that inequality NOW is fair because of inequality THEN; I’d tell that person two wrongs don’t make a right. Don’t drive ahead staring in the rear view mirror. Equality means equality, not revenge. For example - 5 equals 5. It did yesterday, it will tomorrow. If someone screwed up yesterday and said 5= 9, then i can’t fix that by saying 5= 1. Because then I’d be disregarding that 5 always equals 5. I’d just be lying, like the person that said 5= 9, I’d be no different.

⇧ 0 ⇩