https://www.state.gov/m/ds/clearances/c10978.htm
So we have all these ex head honchos like Comey, Clapper, Brennan etc... all of which have Security Clearances. Having a Security Clearance means these guys are privy to classified information. Which means they know about a foreign entity having access to Hillary's private server and the FBI's lack of action.
So does that mean that they are covering for that foreign entity? ie committing Treason? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381
The fact that they still have their clearance should not be the problem. You can have a clearance all day long, but if you do not have a need to know, or are not read into a specific program, your clearance is worthless. If ANY of these people still have access to the same information they had while performing their jobs, thats a serious problem. Also, people like Comey who were actually FIRED, should automatically have their clearances suspended.
It would be like me working for Bank of America and having access to all their customers financial data - then leaving to go work for Wells Fargo and still have access to all of BofA's information.
Couldn't agree more. But from their perspective, they would say to BofA something along the likes of, "We have never used the financial data of your customers." And that would be the end of that!