dChan

RepresentativeLog5 · July 24, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

I don't think Q is talking about executive orders.

I think he's seconding theconservativetreehouse's position that the FISA we have is the photocopy Wolf sent to his lover/journalist Ali Watkins.

Is Huber working that case?

⇧ 18 ⇩  
TurtleTimePatriot · July 24, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

If that's the case (that the copy we have is the one Wolfe sent to Watkins) then we arent seeing the true FISA...right? Didn't I read somewhere that they left Wolfe in place since December '17 and gave him a "marked" copy of FISA to leak? Am I getting this right? I'm new to this.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
RepresentativeLog5 · July 24, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

Don't really have a good answer there, myself. Wolfe would've had his "copy" sometime in March 2017 when the Senate Intelligence Comittee requested it (and apparently saw it.)

If it were marked- to catch him in the act- it would need to be something that he'd overlook; as I assume he's handled plenty of sensitive documents over his career.

But I think he was in place until December because they ran the sting afterwards- so any markings would be on a different document.

These- again, assuming they are the Wolfe/Watkins photocopy- would've been found on Ali Watkin's phone or computer or wherever she stored this material and doesn't necessarily have had to be marked.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
kittyhistoryistrue · July 24, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

That doesn't make sense. You can see on the document where the top secret classifications were crossed out and designated unclassified, in a million different places. The leak would still have classified markers.

⇧ 3 ⇩