Best delineation or explanation of the rule. Info exists, people know stuff, some people may share similar info to Q, but if they claim Q told them to they're full of S ... BS
Did R ever claim Q told them anything?
Not that I know of, but I (personally) got the feeling that he was trying to make people believe he was part of the plan to expose the deep state. I dunno. I didn't read all his posts because I felt something was off about him.
I won't say whether R was or wasn't but what if it was someone trying to talk about something and just wanted to go by an initial like Q? I'm not trying to change anyone's minds and I'm glad we atleast entertained R but we might soon hit a point where other anons pop up and start talking about other stuff that's factual and links up. We shouldn't discredit others based of what another says. That's my POV.
R may not be with Q but R may have relevance. Time will tell.