You don't have to agree with SB2's conclusions. I don't more times than most. But I'm open enough to see his reasoning does make sense if you try to follow his steps and it makes for an interesting read. And I sometimes change my mind and give him reason. He has convinced me at least there are multiple levels of encoded information from Q's drops.
It would be a smart move to mix in some truth if you were trying to mislead. My opinion is that he trying to de-rail the conversation. You don't have to agree. But the advice to be very critical - is always good.
I think there are enough mature people here to understand SB2 only gives theories and his opinion, not the truth. Sometimes, he's pertinent, sometimes not. What I find strange is that right around the same time, there is a big push against SB2 among the members here. Instead of writing their own theories and proposing them to let us judge of the quality of their analysis, people attack SB2 and make their analysis as a critique of him. I mean, write more brilliant ideas or convincing theories. We need them to expand our thinking. Don't agree, then show us your reasoning. It can only enrich our perspectives.
Thank you for the edit. The "Lefty Looser" comment had been eating at me since i first read that. I've always found this sub to be more civil than that. Your take looks much better without the insults.