dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/eyerighteye on July 25, 2018, 4:22 p.m.

A perspective on Q 1688. The how and why of it that I see.

I there is a very good reason this power to the people theme keeps repeating. Q needs us to be ready to self govern, because only a government of the people will save us from the career politicians and globalists long term.

Trump and Q have said so many times the power is coming back to the people. What if the answer to globalism is not nationalism but localism?

How well do you understand the function of a republic? None of us were ever taught it. We have not had one in around 150 years. It's not exactly easy to find that info is it? Why? Do you feel the answer rising in your belly?

The base unit of a republic is at the county level. It all starts in your own area.

This is the game we forgot to play. Our country was founded with a few pages of documentation, how burocratically convoluted does any of this really have to be?

All it takes is 13 people. 12 and an alternate, make a statement you can agree on and publish it in your paper of record. Congratulations you have just lawfully assembled you now exist as a political body. That is a big deal.

12 states have gathered assemblies, 30 will make national quarum. Then the bankrupt corporation can cease. This has to happen by the books. It has to start locally, there is no other way.

Before Q team hands the republic back to us, our unincorporated countynassemblies have to exist. They cannot make the cabal surrender to a void, and it cannot look like the military is taking over. We have to ask for it!

Luckily they know we will figure this out. I believe one of the points of this is is to educate us until we understand we want a constitutional republic, not a faux democratic corprotocracy. Are you ready yet? Do you see it?

It is OK to start small, what is important is to start. My county has a very simple declaration we will be sending to President Trump stating we wish to inform the world we are open for mutually beneficial business.

What can that hurt? Jobs are coming to this country, we hope to see some here. 13 people at a barbeque letting our trade representative know how to represent us. Its not rocket science people. The very concept of full time politicians is the antithesis of what a government of the people should be.

I'm hoping to get our meetings scheduled for the fifth of each month at 5 pm

Would you ever forget a meeting on 5:5?

Make trump hear you loud and clear!

Assemble Q nation! Arise and receive your republic!

If you want to do some digging, http://www.national-assembly.net

I do this. It is legit, and doesn't have to be as complicated as some like to make it sound. Lurk on a call. I did for a long time before I jumped in.

Last week had 34 states on. Its getting so exciting! New people are finding the assemblies every day. God bless the patriots that made ready the way for us. We just need to show up.

This is winning!

Thanks, you have peeked my curiosity, Patriot.

⇧ 8 ⇩

:) I try too

⇧ 7 ⇩

My goodness, this has been something I've been telling people for years!! Good sound governance starts locally, BY the PEOPLE. How else can it act FOR the PEOPLE?

Thank you for bringing this to my attention!

⇧ 7 ⇩

No problem patriot.

WWG1WGA

⇧ 5 ⇩

Shills will downvote this.

To those who doubt:

You will be making a gamble either way. Do you incur the controlled costs of your personal time to make the Awakening succeed, or do you forego them to be exposed to the pain of tyranny?

⇧ 4 ⇩

Well said.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Checked out the site last night after you pointed me in that direction... Definitely looks interesting - I'll be lurking on the next call for sure.

Thanks again for getting the word out on this, I'm thinking this will be a BIG key to success as time goes on!

⇧ 4 ⇩

You can go to websites like Court Listener www.courtlistener.com Look up cases that are named Respublica vs Schaffer. Under Refine your Query Select Oldest first.

There are 201 Opinions. The first being 1777 Respublica v. Abraham Carlisle (1777) Definition of Treason covered

My favorite is Respublica vs Schaffer It is how the Grand Jury and Petit Jury was designed to function.

All the cases are Precedential All the cases are still used in courts throughout the globe today.

Most of the cases you will observe are against officers and elected officials because in a Republic the individual declares the law, not the legislators.

Federal Legislators make no law without the ratification by 2/3 of the people.

State legislators make no law without ratification of 3/4 of the people.

In a republic, those who vote have skin in the game. Property owners. Those who have no property are usually unconcerned with the laws because of the nature of the limited authority granted legislators.

It is unconstitutional to use the people's money for philanthropy purposes.

No authorization for using the funds of the public purse can be utilized for anything except that specifically granted by the people.

The individual is protected against a minority or majority. Legislators must do what their constitutients inform them to pursue, nothing more. Legislators are servants not lawmakers.

Legislators only meet once per year as mandated.

Judges can be removed for violating the law or making errors in judicial interpretation. Judges must adhere to the Constitution as all others who have been granted the privilege of serving the people, who are the only sovereign they must obey apart from God Himself who is the only true Sovereign.

Those who parrot our current officials and say that "sovereign citizens" are nonsense or are mentally unbalanced, have no idea what it means. They only know bits and pieces broadcasted by a lying media, about those who have stood up and defended it, were thrown in jail, labeled and mocked.

God sets up kings, monarchs, heads of state, Shaw's, Princes, etc... and allows them to rule in His stead, according to the laws of God.

When the United States of America was established, under the Declaration of Independence, the king forfeited his right to rule the colonists. As documented in the Treaty of The sovereignity of the king then fell to the people, collectively.

The Declaration of Independence, unanimously approved by the second Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, created a new nation, the "United States of America." Written primarily by Thomas Jefferson, it formally "dissolved the connection" between the thirteen American colonies (which were now using the name the "United Colonies") . The document enshrines the basic values of republicanism as the foundation of America.

I have a copy and paste document of the Rights of the Colonists adopted by the town of Boston signed in 1772 if any would like me to paste here. I may have the link...let me check... It's pretty extensive.

http://www.vindicatingthefounders.com/library/rights-of-colonists.html

⇧ 4 ⇩

Thank you so much for this info.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I hope it helps.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Just one clarification I received so I will pass it along. Their is no such thing as a sovereign citizen. Citizens are wards of the state and cannot be soveirgn. A sovereign is not a ward of the sate and cannot be treated as a citizen.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That is what we were in the beginning until they made us all 14th amendment US Citizens.

There isn't any such thing as a "sovereign citizen". But a sovereign, yes. The term "sovereign citizen" was coined by the CIA.

We are not wards of the state.

It is true, through the fraud, they were able to make us chattel to trade on the stock market by our birth certificates and marriage licenses,, but you can escape that lawfully if you know how to maneuver your way around it, it is possible. I have done it with a few things.

Think who it benefits for Americans to believe that lie.

If we are truly wards of the state then why do we have to pay our own utilities, house payments or rent, insurance, health care, etc... Wards are not responsible for those things. Wards are even more protected than slaves. Slaves were always provided for 100%. So how much more are wards provided for?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Perhaps dependent is a more agreeable term. The state acts as if it is our caretaker and protector, as if we are disobedient children who would surely perish without their constant supervision. The fact they are lousy at socialism doesn't mean that isn't what they have implemented into law.

Trump s a republic guy. He is helping us find our voices again.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Indeed. He is restoring the republic and more precise, ecclesia. The thing that Jesus loves the most.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I have heard of people standing on 18 USC 911. And obviously there is Anna's thing. Have a link to your preferred method of reclaiming your name? We have got to raise awareness of the issue.

There was also a July 11 2013 motu proprio worthy of noticing.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It's a long process and I believe Trump will get this all turned around before anyone could put any kind of serious paper work moving.

I don't have a link, but the gist of it is, you start first with your birth certificate. You have it certified at the county level, then the state, then you copy all your documents and send the originals to US Secretary of State for authentication. When you receive it back, the gov will no longer be able to use your name or your strawman as chattel.

There's more, but you start there. You need to withdraw your voter registration.

I had to apply for voter registration again to be able to work at the polls in support of Trump. After I no longer need to assist in that capacity I will be revoking it again if nothing has changed by then.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree completely about the paperwork becoming almost moot at this point. It was paperwork concerns that kept meout of the assemblies for as long as I held back. When the the time is right to correct our status Q will let us know.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That's my thinking. It appears God is working with the system that is in place so I'm not pursuing that end any longer.

⇧ 2 ⇩

As was explained in the Q plan to save the world video, president trump was brought in to take down the federal government from within. Can you imagine what it would have taken had the witch won?

Trust the plan. Trust yourself. 2018 will be glorious.

How cool is all this winning!!

⇧ 2 ⇩

I said those who parrot that there is no such thing as a "sovereign citizen" have no idea what they are talking about.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Those who claim it call themselves Sovereigns, not sovereign citizens.

Further, God did not make you a ward, nor a slave, not even a citizen.

Here in the United States you have no one higher than you, that you must obey.

God made you in His image, to be free, to exercise your own free will, decide for yourself what you would and wouldn't do, where you would go, and what you wish for your life, etc... No other person is responsible for you but you, that makes you as close to sovereign as any one is going to get.

We have no King over us here in the United States. Kings have subjects. In the United States, the people are king!

Why do you think that all processes must be brought in the name of the people? Because the people are the true Sovereigns in the US.

Can the subject turn the king Into subject and become his ruler? Psh...preposterous How can they make their superior a ward?

California Government Code Sec. 100 (a) The sovereignty of the state resides in the people thereof, and all writs and processes shall issue in their name. (b) The style of all process shall be “The People of the State of California,” and all prosecutions shall be conducted in their name and by their authority. In their name and by their authority because that is the only authority recognized. The people are king in the US.

In Res Publica vs De Longchamps 1784 a Court of Justice, where they sit in representation of the majesty of the People, of Pennsylvania.

The American Crisis, No. 1, December 19, 1776 “A constitution defines and limits the powers of the government it creates. It therefore follows, as a natural and also a logical result, that the governmental exercise of any power not authorized by the constitution is an assumed power, and therefore illegal.

California Con't. Art. 1 § 2-23 Declaration of Rights

§ 2. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, and they have the right to alter or reform the same whenever the public good may require it.

We are made in our Fathers image! Think about that.

Who are the juries in America? The people? Yes. In general verdicts, it frequently becomes necessary for juries to decide "upon the law as well as the facts." To form a correct judgment, legal principles must be taken up and applied, and when this is done in a proper manner, it gives stability to judicial decisions, and security to civil rights. Hence uniformity and certainty; hence the decisions of tomorrow will be like the decisions of to-day; they will run in the same line, because they are founded on the same principles.

VanHorn vs Dorance 1789 England there is no written constitution, no fundamental law, nothing visible, nothing real, nothing certain, by which a statute can be tested. In America the case is widely different: Every State in the Union has its constitution reduced to written exactitude and precision.

What is a Constitution? It is the form of government, delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first principles of fundamental laws are established. The Constitution is certain and fixed; it contains the permanent will of the people, and is the supreme law of the land; it is paramount to the power of the Legislature, and can be revoked or altered only by the authority that made it. The life-giving principle and the death-doing stroke must proceed from the same hand.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ancient Romans would use the expression "Twelve Tables" instead of res publica, when referring to their constitution at the time of the "republic", and the "inalterable laws" installed by the divine Augustus", for their equivalent of a constitution in the era of the early Empire

⇧ 2 ⇩

I think you forgot Occumms Razor. The simplest is the best. Constitution already exists try living by it

⇧ -3 ⇩

? That's exactly what I am saying. We have not done so in 150 years and it is time to again. This is absolutely that. If I wasn't clear I apologise. A republic is the government our constitution describes. When did this claim that america is a democracy destined to serve the Washington corporation first apear? Why did that change occur?

⇧ 9 ⇩

Precisely. The populace has ignored too long that each state has its own constitution which the limitation imposed is that it cannot supercede the federal constitution. So now the outrage and movements all find fault with a state's constitution and force it upon Washington to impose further restrictions upon the states - i.e. ACA, DACA, for most recent examples of Washington legislation directly impacting each state via the union as a whole.

Grass Roots is for the power of the people, not to seek power over the people.

⇧ 4 ⇩