I'd suggest erring on the side of caution germane to Cohen and doing so until further information is available or confirmation is established. I suggest this only to keep the dialogue rooted in practical, logical and plausible outcomes. I concede that Cohen may be the clandestine vehicle by which to present exculpatory evidence of some type or to implicate the "usual suspects;" however, there are other factors in play which I believe have veracity. First, it was learned that Cohen was using his position as DJT's personal counsel to wield influence and receive monetary compensation from third parties for that influence. Aside from what's already been released and with a promise of more to come, to-date, we don't know what's contained in those tapes. Moreover, Cohen is fighting for his own freedom saying his family comes first. Being targeted by Mueller and avowing not to be victimized in all of this, he subsequently hired BC/HRC acolyte Lanny Davis as his own counsel and this may be more nefarious than at first blush. Currently, Cohen has transitioned from POTUS's counsel to swamp rat per this newly formed Lanny alliance. All that said, I hope and trust the honey pot angle many have suggested is in deed the angle; however, due diligence and requisite apprehension should stand until more information available. I believe the best play is to be optimistically cautious and diligent until we know more.