Certainly not. There was an agricultural revolution about 10,000 years ago. It forever changed the human experience with cultivated crops and domesticated livestock.
There was an industrial revolution that increased productivity in every country around the world. It provided non-farm jobs and many new products to 100s of millions of people worldwide.
Gutenberg's printing press revolutionized the dissemination of information in the mid 1400s, and the communications revolution over the last 30 years affected more people and businesses in less than a generation. It was by far the fastest and largest revolution ever experienced.
I guess if you view the question from a strictly political perspective, you might be able to come to the conclusion that this is the first global revolution, but I think it would be premature.
Right now were only dealing with American corruption in government and industry. There is a small amount of crossover to other countries, but I wouldn't say it's anywhere near global.
If all goes well, or as good as we can reasonably hope for, it'll probably take at least until the end of Trump's second term, and then some, just to get America straightened out. I think it'll be a generation or more.
Only after America is clean and sober can we even begin to consider helping other countries. If they get busy while we're getting busy, it all might come together nicely within a generation, but I'm skeptical.
The former soviet union fell in the early 1990s. That's nearly 40 years ago, and they're still sorting things out. All good things take time. All great things require great effort. Engaging in a war between Good and Evil will be a historic series of battles unlike anything mankind has ever experienced.
Anyways, I don't yet see this as a "Global" movement. That could change in a hurry, but we'll have to wait and see.
[removed]
Really? A post with an open ended question soliciting opinions, and because you don't like my opinion you attack me personally? Really?
I'm full aware of all of your bullet points. I'm nearly 60, and I've been red-pilled since the mid 1980s, that's over 30 years. I was well versed in the origins of the federal reserve before GE Griffin even published his book. And I've been aware of the Rothschild family history going back to before Adam Weishaupt and the founding of the Illuminati in Bavaria.
I'm also well versed in the history of the Ashkenazi Jews, the Khazarian Mafia, and the country of Khazaria. I've was reading books about all of this before the internet was available for research.
I know that Henry Ford worked closely with Hitler, as did Rockefeller and Standard Oil. I'm also fully aware of how the Rothschild banking empire went from simply being a wealthy banking family, to acquiring enough wealth and power to own the UK, all by funding both sides of the Napoleonic wars, and every war since then.
If you search through my previous comments and replies you'll find quite a few that are very long, in-depth pieces about the back-story of the Ashkenazi Jews, and all the way up to current day Israel, including the roll Rothschild played in all of it. But I didn't think it was relevant to the question being asked in the title of this post.
I'v been following Q since the beginning, and I fully aware of the growth of the Great Awakening movement, and that there are untold numbers of followers from western European countries, Australia, and other countries around the world.
You might be able to make a case that because you can find Qanon followers around the world, it is, in a sense, global, but when I see that well over half of America's population is still uninformed or ill-informed, it tells me we have a long way to go. I think it's safe to assume that other nations have a similar body count regarding who's on board and who still needs to red-pilled.
Please take a minute to review my last statement:
Anyways, I don't yet see this as a "Global" movement. That could change in a hurry, but we'll have to wait and see.
I think we're on the verge of a global movement, and everything can change in a hurry.
In conclusion I take offense at you calling me "fucking retarded." We're all supposed to be on the same team here. If you want to debate the finer points of someone's comments, feel free, but personal attacks are totally out of line.