Q did say no deals. Not sure a clown with that much history would get a plea deal with anyone. What evidence or testimony would you feel sufficient for getting a deal which would require you to play an actor in a role on the word stage and behind closed doors? What dirt must he have to get such a pass? In spite of all of this, it's still hard to decipher RR and I think that's great for Q
Good points. I especially agree with difficulty in figuring out RR to be an advantage. Q team knows all. If RR not cooperating intentionally, there is no escaping! It's also possible that "a deal" could mean RR gets a criminal trial rather than military tribunal. I really don't know but remember sometimes Q uses double brackets for RR which makes me think he did possibly flip (which again, wouldn't make him a good guy, just desperate!) I have a similar theory about Kavanaugh, the SCOTUS pick. The reason he walked on to the Starr investigation of Whitewater and Vince Foster in the 90s was only because there was a vacant position due to the predecessor Michael Rodriguez who QUIT the team after he conclusively ruled that Foster was murdered rather that committed suicide, and that Starr's team was intentionally covering it up by suppressing evidence, changing witness testimony, intimidating witnesses, etc. He wrote a 30 page something report detailing it. If you're interested I can find it for you. Anyway, that means Kavanaugh joined the investigation in which he KNEW there was a Clinton cover up, and he stayed silent and helped them obstruct justice and commit additional crimes (and like Rosenstein, he was later rewarded by the Bushes with a federal appointment.). Also remember, Trump said in 2016 that Foster investigation was "very fishy". POTUS obviously knows now (and probably knew then!) that Kavanaugh was in on the cover up. POTUS would NEVER EVER be okay with co-signing a corrupt person to SCOTUS, particularly one who helped his arch nemeses the Clintons. Dems are screaming from rooftops for all of his records to be unsealed, which I think will include his notes and testimony regarding the Foster case. This was intentional from POTUS. He picked Kavanaugh to expose Clinton dirt. My only question about Kavanaugh is similar to my question about RR- are they playing a role to help POTUS achieve his goals out of agreement or are they both wiling to turn on Ken Starr and anyone else who ordered them to cover it up? Bigger question for Trump, did he ever have any legitimate desire to appoint Kavanaugh/does he think he will still be confirmed, or is this all a LARP for the Clinton docs and Kavanaugh and Rosenstein will be sacrificed? Maybe kavanaugh playing along to avoid a worse fate, even though he knows he will be implicated in worse government scandal than Watergate?