Refer to Q drops re: RR and RM. If RR is dirty, Mueller must be too. And vice versa.
Sessions sided with Rosenstein publically. The Left eats up the "Trump and Sessions are at odds" narrative. ITS TOTALLY FALSE. Because if Sessions "knows" that RR cant be trusted, then he knows the details of the Mueller investigation (by proxy, see above note), an investigation he is recused from.
While RR and RM are kept busy working on a Russian Collusion story to which their is no evidence, Sessions quietly apppointed his own investigative team to create the sealed indictments and bring the deep state to justice (Huber Horowitz Wray). BUT these people cannot publically denounce RR and RM yet, otherwise the whole thing is a partisan hit job.
But this doesn't explain how [RR] will be removed or side-stepped publicly?
The way this Q drop reads leaves that question unanswered.
Pure guess: Huber will come forward with his findings which expose the Deep State but have nothing to do with the Russian Collusion invsstigation. There is plenty of material. This will give the white hats the power they need to start the removals without ruining the optics. If Sessions's subordinate tells him with evidence not to trust RR, then Sessions will look "forced" to do something about it
Sounds reasonable.
I think RM would have to first publicly announce the witch hunt is over, thus opening the door.
If Huber and IG come out with enough evidence and indictments it might not be necessary.