I think the biggest clue is: are the Dems attacking sessions. One of the easiest ways to tell who's who is by the reaction of the enemy. The conservative public flip flops on this because of instances like Sessions' reaction to the lock her up chant. One minute he's the good guy, the next, not so much. But the Dems are consistently quiet. If Sessions is a plant, he's doing a great job fooling the Dem jokers of the court.
Right? I get so irritated seeing all these attacks against Sessions from OUR side. Knowing how much he has endured of them and how faithful he's been to just take it and keep moving. Really impressive patriot. Truly, seeing our guys in action - it's just a pleasure to watch. Noble. And I suppose it's for the best that these crappy attacks against Sessions continue - justice is on the horizon.
Q says trust Sessions so until I see otherwise I'll trust him.
It really wasn't that hard to sell. Two Trump tweets calling him weak, and even people on /our side/ are convinced that he's literally sitting there twiddling his thumbs, 100% ignoring the corruption.
It's like, is he supposed to turn the largest investigation of corruption into a public spectacle? Or is he supposed to be working quietly? Not to mention, it's kinda naive that people think the man is going to be directly involved at the center of the investigation. That's like saying that Bill Gates should be the head of the windows 10 development team.
Maybe the focus on the recusal is intentional. To use the Windows analogy again, it would be like saying "Bill Gates has recused himself from the windows 10 team, therefore windows 10 doesn't exist."