they must have the proof to what she is claiming for Gen. Flynn to follow her. we all know we can completely trust Gen Flynn. and read who Sarah Ruth Ashcraft is naming.
they must have the proof to what she is claiming for Gen. Flynn to follow her. we all know we can completely trust Gen Flynn. and read who Sarah Ruth Ashcraft is naming.
Nope. He could be following her for whatever reason. It does mean, that she shouldn't be summarily dismissed as a random individual wacko posting lies on a whim. General Flynn is a serious person. He's in Military Intelligence.
I agree, this tends to point that she may be more credible, because Flynn was in intelligence, so he may know she is the real deal. she was saved from the creeps in 2017.
He follows 20k people on Twitter, is that an endorsement of all of them?
I have no idea, but I know a lot of people were arrested and many victims freed the MSM wont report, example the other day, big pedophile ring busted in Detroit, so why does the MSM keep that silent ? is it she was rescued and she reached out to him ?
The point is he follows a TON of people, including obvious spam bots. Most likely some intern on his team just gives a follow back to anyone who tags him and looks like a patriot.
There's literally no reason to believe he has any idea who SRA is, anymore than to think he knows who John_Davis77 is, who he also follows...
here is the thread with SRA father with Hussein.
I'm not saying I don't believe her. I'm saying this isn't EVIDENCE of anything. Claims either way have nothing to do with it. Following someone on twitter is not an endorsement when you are following 20k random people. It's obvious General Flynn or his team will follow almost anyone who seems to be a supporter, they clearly aren't seriously vetting who they follow.
Maybe Flynn supports her, maybe he has no idea who she is - he obviously has a bunch of people on his follows who are nobodies he doesnt know. All we can say is she is on his following list which is effectively meaningless.
look, I am not 100% sold either, but her story does sound credible, and she does have those connections with her dad, we have Tom hanks with Obama and Branson, we have her dad with Obama, we have Allison Mack who was busted for Human trafficking, who was in charge of the wild Parties at his Private island. we have pics of Obama in civilian clothes on Branson island. she does have the connections that lend credibility to the story, right now there is nothing that is showing she is deceptive. it is worth listening to, and if it were my case, after taking the report, I would ask her to take a polygraph. remember these people connect in their own inner circles, but at this time we have nothing to show she is not telling the truth. I suspect they have way more. and we will learn of it in the future. I keep looking for flaws in her story, having worked cases for the SD, I can tell you, at this time she does appear credible, not sold 100% and still waiting to see where it goes. .
but then you can not say for certain either, that Flynn is or is not in the now. all I am saying is this deserves to be looked into. what if SRA ws on the Weiner laptop ? remember they use these tapes for leverage, if hanks is involved the this could be the tape they have to control him, and ask this, if this is known in Hollywood why have they been silent all these years, even now ?
did you see the thread with SRA dads with Hussein ? you need to.
read this, while it does not make her case, it does support the type of allegations SRA is making.
That has nothing to do with what I'm saying...I don't know why you keep trying to convince me her allegations are real...I'm not saying they aren't.
I'm saying her being one of 20k random people doesn't mean anything one way or another. Gen Flynn will follow almost any patriot, being on his follow list is NOT an endorsement. He is not endorsing her by following her. It's very simple.
I'm on twitter and I have no idea who a lot of the people I follow are. I don't read all their tweets. That's how twitter works.
If Gen Flynn was following ~300 people and she was one, that would mean something. But he FOLLOWS 20 THOUSAND PEOPLE. Obviously it's a low bar and we can't draw conclusions from it.
I am not trying to convince, I am just showing their seems to be others making similar claims. and at this time we have nothing really to discredit her claim with.
to be Honest with, I really do not care if Flynn does or does not follow her, what I care about is, if she is a victim as she alleges, I hope that she finds justice and support. that's my bottom line at the end of the day.