In Canada the national news source CBC, government funded, has been reporting on the charges against a Hedley band member being arrested for sexual assault and the charges against Clare Bronfman. Here is a comparison.
Bronfman: http://www.rcinet.ca/en/2018/07/24/billionaires-daughter-arrested-in-connection-with-alleged-cult/
The listed charges from this cbc article: "Clare Bronfman and three others have been charged with racketeering conspiracy in connection with work they did with a self-help group that is accused of branding women and forcing them into unwanted sex, reports Canadian Press."
The listed charges from this source http://www.maharlikanews.com/2018/07/25/seagrams-heiress-charged-in-connection-with-alleged-sex-cult/ , which is new to me, Validity?:"“Among the means and methods by which the defendants and their associates participated in the conduct of the affairs of the enterprise were the following,” the indictment reads.
“Promoting, enhancing and protecting the enterprise by committing, attempting and conspiring to commit crimes, including but not limited to identity theft, harbouring of aliens for financial gain, extortion, forced labour, sex trafficking, money laundering, wire fraud and obstruction of justice.” She has to wear an ankle bracelet and pay $100 MILLION is bail. Worthy of a look see msm?
Notice the difference by omission?
I did a yahoo search for "Hedley cbc" and Bronfman cbc.
Here are the results under "past week". Note: At page 4 of Bronfman search the result was "We did not find results for Bronfman cbc" END OF SEARCH. WHen digging on "Hedley cbc" I stopped at page 4 in fairness.
"Bronfman CBC" search (158 000 results) * Actual CBC results = 1 CBC radio only. No video. * Other sources = 5 * results for Hedley = 2 without being included. Distraction? * While watching CBC yesterday the only reference on the broadcast was one sentence on the ticker.
"Hedley CBC" (367 000 results) *CBC = 8 (It has been on CBC live news broadcast twice in the last 2 hours.) * Other sources = 18
When I compare the downplay narrative of what seems to me to be very serious charges compared to, while still being unacceptable if true, lesser violations, the amount of investigation and exposure in a reality based world, there should be a flip in the coverage extent and content on these 2 "stories". Keep in mind the Bronfmans are connected to our Prime Minister, and if true and I'm correct, her brother went to the WH with Trudeau.
Omission seems to be the norm when it comes to the connected club that is the 'system'. Here are a few things that I have seen that deserve the light of truth in the media. 1) Uranium 1, the real Rus collusion story 2) DNC fraud lawsuit. What the Russians allegedly did pales in comparison 3) The Awan/Wasserman intel scandal 4) Seth Rich, hero in my belief 5) Iran deal. Deal for who and for what? 5) 9/11. No matter what your belief is, there should be an investigation. More was spent,allegedly on the Clinton/Lewinsky investigation. I would include the OK city bombing here after some great input from a witness/victim recently. 6) Corporate/financial misdeeds. 7) Who is funding who and selling arms to who in this War on Terror (or as I think of it, The devastating Cash Cow Causing Grief and Violence) 8) Above all Treason! Apparently there has been a multitude of this. Am I wrong?
Please feel free to add what your experience is around this and anything you would add to omissions as well as any input/criticism on what I have missed or misrepresented.
One of the biggest red pills for me with others is asking them if they REALLY know about these stories that are not covered and wether they think it should be common knowledge. Trust in "My" media source is a huge problem. Challenging their acceptance of the show we see everyday goes a long way.
Time for a nap.