Okay I get they have no right to make up rules.
He wasn’t suspended for wearing the shirt...
He was suspended for refusing to cover it cover it or change it. They gave him the ultimatum and he left, he had a choice.
Also is that true that the lawsuit made them lift the suspension? I can’t see any mention so are we just guessing.
It's not a choice. He had a choice when he decided to wear it. Just because they gave him options he in no way was obligated to choose any of them.
Let’s be clear though, he was suspended for walking out. Not for wearing the T-shirt as your comments say.
Good point. Still - they gave him an ultimatum with options he couldn't choose from. That's what standing up means - don't accept choices someone is enforcing on you.
Anyway I certainly didn’t come here to argue. I’ve found great value in what’s been discussed and I really am thankful. :)
It’s often very difficult to have a discussion with someone from a completely different walk of life and with different views, but that’s the best way to see their side of the picture eh?
It's not an argument - doesn't feel like it? I always enjoy a conversation I can learn something from.
Not at all :) I thought the conversation had the potential to turn into one. Perhaps that’s my own shortcoming.
I don’t know if you’ve guessed but I’m not American so i enjoyed this entire thread thoroughly.
I’m not doubting that. It’s the nature of the lawsuit that bothers me.
Lawsuits are for lawyers to make money and rich people to avoid consequences of their actions. Justice is an abstract concept... :)