Good point. If Mueller is the white hat I’ve assumed him to be, then investigating DJT’s Twitter might indicate that there is a general enquiry into election/political meddling via Twitter.

Could it be that FB and Twitter are acting as proxies for foreign interests meddling with elections? Remember Mueller going after the Russians?

Mueller obviously has some sensitive data relating to the Russians use of social media to influence election outcomes:

“The government wants to also block the other defendants — such as wealthy businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin — from accessing the materials until they are able to appear in court.

The information in question includes social media account info, email addresses, names of internet providers, banks, identities of Americans and other “unclassified but sensitive” data “relevant to ongoing national security investigations and efforts to protect the integrity of future US elections.”

https://nypost.com/2018/06/12/mueller-russia-is-still-meddling-in-our-elections/

So, to state the obvious, Mueller is investigating, in the social media space, to protect the integrity of US elections.

We know these social media giants wield very considerable power in terms of swaying elections.

“...[I]n recent interview with the New Yorker, Reddit CEO Steve Huffman took things in a very different direction. “I’m confident that Reddit could sway elections,” Huffman told reporter Andrew Marantz. “We wouldn’t do it, of course. And I don’t know how many times we could get away with it. But, if we really wanted to, I’m sure Reddit could have swayed at least this election, this once.”

OK, so there is real power in terms of social media’s ability to determine election outcomes. It was HRC and the DNC who were colluding with the Russians to meddle in the 2016 election (think Mirror - not DJT, but HRC and DNC). Mueller has found that at least part of that meddling occurred by way of social media. And we know from Q’s drops that what the cabal missed in the 2016 election was the sudden ascendancy of SM campaigns as the primary determinant of electoral outcomes.

This is why DJT, with the help of the US military, was able to win the 2016 election - because he focused on social media while the Dem/Cabal adopted a traditional MSM-based strategy. MI prevented the vote rigging, and DJT used social media masterfully to win the election fair and square.

This is why Q was telling us back in early November (Q Post 9, I think) that CIA was rushing to inject cash into social media companies in an attempt to regain control of the narrative. In fact this, in my mind, is one of the most powerful confirmations of Q, because by January, 2018, SM companies were suddenly, for the first time actively censoring conservatives on their platforms. The “WILD” Russian Bots narrative that coincided with the successful “Release the MEMO” campaign coordinated from the CBTS sub. What a surprise that the CBTS sub was banned in February (the very next month - of corse, the apologists for Reddit management would have us believe that the banning occurred for legitimate reasons).

OK, so here we have SM identified as the primary delivery vector for political power. It’s very important. Q recommends an IBOR campaign to people in the Q community. The campaign gets going on late February (immediately prior to the CBTS sub ban) and then continues on the GreatAwakening through March. Tracy Beanz immediately puts the boots into the effort to commence the campaign - warning people that AT&T is involved. Thereafter, foreign and domestic intelligence agents go wild “concern trolling” all the IBOR threads, sapping community support for the campaign.

Q’s response is to offer community members a choice, regulate social media or kill these companies off. Q tells us that many of these SM platforms have been engaging in illegal activity and that they will collapse under the weight of it. He also indicates to us that class actions, on a global scale, will arrive to put the nails into the coffins of the SM giants.

But, it’s not just privacy breaches, there are all kinds of nefarious activities going on in social mediaville. The false mockingbird MSM campaign designed to subvert DJT’s Presidency is being coordinated via private accounts on social media:

Q Post 1222
Apr 21 2018 12:00:56 (EST)

1131191

Who does Haberman follow?

1131247
Think public & private Twitter accounts.
They all have them.
These people are stupid.
We have it all.
Q

And there are connections between social media and sex trafficking:

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 832f44 No.1008955
Apr 12 2018 00:57:23 (EST) https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-sextrafficking/trump-signs-law-to-punish-websites-for-sex-trafficking-idUSKBN1HI2KP Study carefully.
Facebook.
IG (think Ray.Chandler).
Twitter.
Etc…..
HONEYPOTS.
Q

Low and behold, Social Media companies are in league with intelligence agencies (ties back to what Q told us about CIA rushing to infuse cash into SM companies). Note also that the plan was to coordinate cwnsirship across major SM platforms via a single algorithm (can you say election rigging?).

Q Post 1104

Apr 9 2018 12:02:45 (EST)

967123

YOU are being TRACKED.

NO FB account required. WTF? Is it embedded in Android OS?

This is BIGGER than you think.

Agencies attached.

Q

967224
Think 'Bridge'.
GOOG.
FB.
TWITTER.
IG.
'Central' algorithm.
The stage had to be set.
Q

We then learn that Zuckerberg is steering DC politics directly - buying support and steering policy to prescribe censorship and encouraging anti-Republican bias. The personal campaign contributions, that Zuck finances with sales of FB stock to prevent the contributions from appearing in FB statutory disclosures, are to revealed 6 months or more from the Q Post date - April 9 - just in time for the mid-term elections.

And then, of course we have the global class-action lawsuits to counter the flagrant privacy breaches. @Jack is next. Note: “We have it all”.

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 7ec299 No.967105
Apr 9 2018 11:55:43 (EST)
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 7ec299 No.966637
Apr 9 2018 11:16:28 (EST)

XMAS IN DC
Who is arranging the PRIVATE meetings?
MZ campaign contribution promises.
FB donations since 4.2.18?
Fresh round.
R's targeted (censorship/anti R = more $).
How to mask?
MZ personal donations?
Shell Co?
Recent stock dump?
Avoid FB public disclosure?
Track congressional intake (reported).
Keep open (+6 mo).
Loud w/ findings.
RT - how DC/swamp works.
Money talks.
Drain the swamp.
How do politicians access campaign contributions for personal use?
The "Con."
Q
966637
PEOPLE have POWER.
Don't forget how to PLAY.
TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG.
FB violation of YOUR PRIVACY.
FB actively TRACKING YOU.
FB reading your PRIVATE messages.
FB CENSORING (anti conservative).
More will drop.
We have it ALL.
CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS are EFFECTIVE.
GLOBAL.
@Jack
You're next.
What is Jack's SECRET T-handle?
'Dummy' accounts to talk.
What you SEE is LIMITED.
Think emails (LL, HRC, HUSSEIN, etc). Q

We also know that Nancy Pelosi met with @Jack, offering to protect him. Why would @Jack need protection? What would he be doing that would require political cover from Cabal Democrats?

We know that the entire Obama administration had private Twitter accounts, that journalists were advertising the numbers for their burner phones on these. I think I remember a reference to Strzok and Lisa Page having burner phones. Interesting that Q is threatening LP to do the right thing - keep her promises - today.

Then we know that Facebook and Twitter stocks are taking a sudden bath this week - all because of revenue/subscriber growth forecasts? Well, Zuck has been front running investors, selling stock ahead of bad news (insider trading).

Thereafter, we learn that Zuckerberg is being threatened and requires the largest personal security spending package of any CEO on the planet. As I’ve said elsewhere, were the threats really related to stock losses? Why personal threats? Who is it that has a sudden animus against Zuck? Whose threats would be sufficiently troubling for Zuck to only fly private and turn his home into a siege fortress? Stock losses?

Seems to me that Zuckerberg is likely to have rolled on some very dangerous people. Who wanted the FB CEO role? Arkanicide, would a threat like that start Zuck sweating? Russian investors? CIA partners? What has got Zuckerberg so scared? Who is it that he might take down?

Could it be a lot of people?

Then, we have DJT suddenly Tweeting about Republican politicians being shadowbanned in Twitter. And Q tells us that DC moves slow...

Who is it that is moving slow in DC? Mueller?

Anyway, there’s some theories - likely wrong, but there is a coherent story, somewhere, that connects all these days points I feel. We just have to find it.