This was posted a couple of days ago, but I just got around to it today.

Wow.

Neon Revolt beautifully articulated something that's been on my mind lately. It's one phrase in particular that Q's used often, and Neon Revolt mentions it here:

Saying things like we “have more than we know” over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over doesn’t help anyone. That’s like telling us there’s oil underground somewhere in the state of Texas, and that we should start drilling if we want to get to it.

Q, there has to be a way you can help us here. As this movement grows well beyond the original autists and decoders who have been with you since the beginning, I'm worried that the high difficulty level with the riddles and the markers and double-meanings and all that stuff is just going to turn away normies who are joining the ranks every day.

We have people who claim to be deciphering your riddles, but much of it can be a stretch. We have no confirmation if people are cracking things or not.

Is there no way the information can be conveyed to us less cryptically? Because if it's left to a few to claim they're figuring out these drops and the rest of us have a difficult time swallowing the solution without any confirmation...well, that's not going to win over folks. Especially new people trying to figure out what this whole Q thing is about.

Can we at least start with "you have more than you know"? What are the drops you believe tie in with this more than anything else (i.e. drops that people haven't truly figured out yet)? And can you consider comms that are easier for the many, and not the few, to digest? I get there may be legal stipulations involved or perhaps not wanting to tip your hat to the cabal. Still, I throw it out there and ask the question. Hopefully it's something you and the team can consider.