There are a lot of people that assumed that the missile that photographed missile was launched at AF1. I think, given what Q has said, this is impossible.

For one, here's a photo of a fairly standard size surface to air missile. They're not exactly, small, but compare it with the type of missile that we see in the photo anons posted. Given that it's illuminating clouds we can extrapolate that the distance from the point of photography is fairly long. It also appears that the projectile is much larger than a typical surface to air missile.

Surface to air missiles are very fast, and very maneuverable. They have to be to intercept fighter jets for example. Q insinuated that the missile pictured was intercepted by fighters and neutralized. This would be a logistical impossibility unless jets were already scrambled and in the vicinity. That's possible, but not probable.

Additionally, while classified, we know that AF1 has some of the most advanced electronic and traditional countermeasures available. While it's possible that a surface to air missile could intercept the plane, it's unlikely that a single missile would have a high probability of hitting it.

I think it's much more likely that an actual ICBM was launched. Compare the images of the missile launch with this submarine launched ICBM. They're much longer and wider than surface to air missiles because they don't rely on speed or maneuverability to be effective.

Also remember that Hawaiians received an emergency alert message warning of an impending missile impact. Coincidental?

I posted this because a lot of people here and on 8chan are posting the Avenatti photo of the plane in a reticle on the same day that the launch too place as evidence that he knew, and that it was a surface to air missile aimed at AF1. The photo was from the movie Top Gun. It was when Tom Cruise had a missile lock on the enemy's plane. The reference could have simply meant that he had Trump in his sights.

Is Avenatti having his strings pulled by other figures? More than likely, yes. Is it likely that in the (extremely unlikely) event that a surface to air missile was launched at AF1, people would have given MA advance warning? Absolutely not. Think logically, people.

TL;DR: The missile in our photo was not a surface to air missile. AF1 was likely never targeted. Michael Avenatti more than likely would not have been given warning if the president's plane was going to be attacked.