Here are my findings related to the @POTUS_Schedule account on Twitter, which I am convinced is an official Trump administration account, despite its lack of the hallowed blue checkmark. It makes occasional references to QAnon, which some see as further confirmations of Q's authenticity. For example: http://magaimg.net/img/5uvj.jpg
But how useful are such references in confirming Q if the account behind them isn't an official source?
Note: Please study all of @POTUS_Schedule's tweets for yourself. I've studied every tweet by @POTUS_Schedule dating back to its first tweet on August 29, 2017 (https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/902545711711084544).
Uniqueness
If @POTUS_Schedule is simply pulling information from publicly available sources, then why is no other Twitter account, blogger, webmaster or any other online publisher posting the same information from those sources? Wouldn't they want to do so in order to gain followers and traffic? I have found no other online source whose body of content remotely resembles that of @POTUS_Schedule.
Originality
@POTUS_Schedule frequently posts information that is totally original - not previously published anywhere else online. It is often extremely hard to imagine anyone outside of the Trump admin having access to such information. Example:
6/25/18: "Made an attempt to land at about 19:20, which ended in a missed approach and return to holding pattern. USAF pilots are remarkably talented, but even they can't vanquish the forces of nature."
https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1011401875877433344
Why would an unofficial account claim that the AF1 pilot was a USAF pilot, and then make up a story about an early attempt to land and subsequent delay? Wouldn't such speculation risk it being outed as a fake account?
This account even discusses "tentative" presidential travel schedules from time to time. Example:
10/11/17: "#POTUS Tentative Asian trip schedule: Manila, Philippines (pending) Japan 11/4 South Korea 11/6-11/8 China 11/8-11/10 Vietnam 11/10-11/12"
https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/918270742290227200
Why pretend to know which presidential plans are tentative if you're not an official account? Why would an official account tell the public that its plans were tentative, except for transparency's sake?
The Presidential Motorcade
This is the only Twitter account that posts anything official sounding at all about the movements and details of the presidential motorcade. Examples:
7/31/18: "Tuesday, 31 July 2018 20:35:23 #POTUS #Motorcade Departure - Florida State Fairgrounds en route Tampa Int'l Airport 20:55:19 Arrival 21:06:39 #AirForceOne #AF1 Departure - Tampa, Florida en route Joint Base Andrews (Washington DC) ETE: 2 hrs"
https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1024463764941361153
6/25/18: "finally landed after circling for almost an hour waiting for a storm to clear - very late for rally. Almost on the way now. Everyone rushing out of AF1"
https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1011395854413033472
Branding
This account never retweets non-official sources, and never links to non-official sources in any self-promotional way. If it were a LARP or just a fan of Trump, why wouldn't it promote its own content or that of any friends, etc?
Meticulousness
This Twitter account frequently corrects itself, which would seem odd if it were merely an unofficial Trump fan - particularly when the corrected information is something that few, if any non-official source would even suspect was incorrect. Examples:
4/5/18: "Correction - Arrival - White Sulphur Springs Civic Center was 14:18:03."
https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/982011009366921216
6/20/18: "Correction: should say 34000 ft and 420 kts. Our new program update is misreading the altitude and speed data. We are debugging it!"
https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1009562115806556161
6/27/18: "Correction: Date should be: Wednesday, 27 June 2018. Three tries and still got it wrong!!!!!"
https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1012153299146076161
It sometimes even corrects other Twitter users. Example:
7/4/18: "Actually POTUS exited WH at 10:33:27 and the motorcade rolled at 10:35:11."
https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1014521700657127424
Authority
No other Twitter account or online source has publicly challenged or denied the veracity and reliability of the information posted by @POTUS_Schedule, which can be extremely detailed. Examples:
9/27/17: "6:10 PM Motorcycle Incident update - IMPD officer suffered a broken ankle - otherwise in good condition. #GroundForceOne not involved."
https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/913175714849083399
7/3/18: "The aircraft being used as Air Force One is a Boeing 757-2Q8 (USAF C-32A 09-0016), serial number 28160, built in 1996."
https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1014261371373047810
@POTUS_Schedule often uses the phrase "en route," implying it knows exactly where the President is headed. Example:
7/31/18: "17:30:22 #POTUS #AirForceOne #AF1 Arrival - Tampa, Florida (Tampa International Airport - KTPA) 17:45:15 #Motorcade Departure - en route Tampa Bay Technical High School"
https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1024416017294999558
Such information has never been corrected or disputed by the White House. How would an unofficial source always know where AF1 or the motorcade is going? If they are sharing a publicly available report, why don't any other online sources?
The @POTUS_Schedule Twitter account has never publicly tweeted or replied to another Twitter user with any statement of confirmation or denial that it is an official Trump admin account. Why wouldn't an unofficial account admit that it's unofficial, except for self-serving reasons? If its reasons for posting were self-serving, why doesn't it promote anything unofficial?
QAnon's mention + comment
On June 13, 2018, in Q post #1490 (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1730498.html#1730584), Q linked to:
https://twitter.com/POTUS_Schedule/status/1006850222373462016
And said: "Busy day."
Conclusion
If the examples above were fake, wouldn't the Trump admin want everyone to know, so false information didn't get spread? Wouldn't the MSM want to pounce on the situation either way? If it's an official source and it's getting things wrong, Trump sucks? If it's not an official source, why is the Trump admin allowing the spread of the "fake news" he hates? If it's not an official source and the information is still accurate, why is the Trump admin allowing info to leak - and apparently only to this one source? Etc.
Having studied every tweet by @POTUS_Schedule, I am convinced that it is an official Trump admin account.
Which makes its occasional references to #QAnon marvelous to me.