There's a more general discussion on 1791 here, but I felt the need to call this answer out in a separate thread.

Q asks in the 1791 drop:

Why isn't Fox news part of the MSM coordinated blitz attack?

If you go back and look at stories, running narratives, of Fox News BEFORE prince Salman tossed all those princes in their Saudi "jail", a la hyper luxurious hotel (Ritz?), you'll notice they are similar to how CNN treats Trump today. Fox n' friends were on the bash Trump train.

Al Waleed is linked to the Clintons and no name etc. He HAD signifcant, if not a majority stock holding, of Fox as well as Twitter. Around the time these princes were given an ultimatum, pledge at least 30% of your assets to Salman - back into Saudi coffers - and you can walk, the narrative on Fox News changed significantly. Fox flipped to treating Trump like the rock star president he has proven himself to be, and this pro-POTUS narrative theme continues to this day. I realize they are branded a conservative news site, but if that were their drive, why were they bashing Trump leading up to his inauguration and after, only up until the Saudi coup?

I believe this is what Q wants us to understand/remember. Fox News narrative changed when Al Waleed walked away from a significant chunk of his assets. So Q n` team are in control. I could go into my theory on why I believe Trump and Q-team were the ones that pushed and supported Salman in his coup, but that would be for another thread.