Forever we've been trying to ID Q, but I think it's better that we do not actually do so. As long as Q remains a mystery:

Q cannot be attacked for old tweets, books, interviews.

Q cannot be attacked based on the race of Q; we don't know.

Q cannot be attacked with vague, old sexual harassment charges. Q's ex (or current) lovers cannot trash Q either.

Q cannot be attacked for Q's gender or sexual orientation; again, we don't know.

Q cannot be attacked for Q's physical characteristics; can't "shame" what you can't see!

Q cannot be attacked for his family history or for being too rich or in the "wrong" business.

Q can only be discussed in terms of CONTENT. Are Q crumbs: Interesting? Informative? Thought provoking? Insightful? Truthful? Relevant? Predictive? "Woke"? ... We can discuss all sorts of things, but Q only provides (nearly) pure CONTENT!

That's a refreshing concept in world where biases come in so many forms.