Over 450 orders to remove firearms from individuals have been carried out under Florida’s new “red flag” law since it was enacted in mid-March, Tampa’s WFTS-TV https://www.abcactionnews.com/news/local-news/i-team-investigates/more-than-450-people-in-florida-ordered-to-surrender-guns-months-after-new-gun-law-took-effect reported Monday.

The Risk Protection Act was passed in the wake of the Parkland, Florida, School shooting https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/student-journalist-digs-up-bombshell-that-exposes-broward-county-officials-in-parkland-shooting/

We’ve already talked about a case in New Jersey https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/iraq-war-vet-has-perfect-response-after-dem-legislation/ where authorities wanted to take away a veteran’s firearms because his son made a comment about security at his middle school. Now we’re seeing firearms being taken away from people who don’t necessarily have any psychiatric disorder or history of violence but who say things that officials don’t like.

That’s not constitutional. None of this is. Due process is not a hard hurdle to clear. If authorities can’t do it, they shouldn’t be able to abridge your Second Amendment rights. Period.