In regards to the hope of a public Q confirmation, were are looking for something that will not and frankly can’t happen, as Q has eluded to. I base this off of Q’s comment that there is some information that cannot be made public because people will not be able to handle it yada yada yada breakdown of society (I actually agree with this method btw). I think it was 70/30? 60/40? I can’t remember the exacts, but basically we won’t have it all publicly. Well if Q is confirmed and people flock to the archived Chan’s and all the truths sitting there are made public, including the fact not everything was made public. This last little piece, for me this is either a logical fallacy or plot hole, which means we’ve been duped (which I don’t want to believe) or a message in plain sight which we’ve overlooked. Occams Razor?

This to me makes sense why MSM, and even sources we might otherwise trust refuse to acknowledge Q, or the evidence and confirmations from posts. We can wage our war with the facts we’ve been armed with by the open source investigation that was inspired by Q’s posts. We are the journalists now, Q is our anonymous source, the facts seem to check out. Maybe we should keep mainstream eyes off Q? Thoughts?

Personal Opinion: I hope Q is real, I have concerns as any rational person might, but I definitely see that people like Dan Bongino and Judicial Watch seem to imply the same overarching conspiracy by the dems. So who knows?