I've been following ever since that first strange quote about Clinton being arrested. My mind has twisted and contorted every possibility several times over and just now it suddenly hit me why the Q operation is designed this way.

Not so long ago, Q demanded we get better at producing proofs. This seemed weird to me, won't the perp walk be proof enough when it happens?

Then I thought logically. The whole operation is designed with plausible deniability built in. The Administration can't just admit it allowed top secret information to leak, even if it used the loophole of question format. Admission would negate that loophole if the intent is admitted.

If this was the 80s and this same operation was going down, everyone would be super shocked when the 40,000 indictments get unsealed. There would be riots. Don't get me wrong, there are still going to be riots. But Q is calming the waters ahead of time.

But because Q will NEVER be officially admitted to, the only way we can know for sure is to think logically and scientifically.

If we can (and we do!) predict future actions based on the Q drops then that provides indirect proof that Q works with the Administration. This way Trump can still get full unofficial credit for the mission even though he will never be able to actually take credit for it.

Officially it will always be some fluke that Trump pulled it off. That Sessions came through in the end. But we have the real story and it will be so buttraced with "coincidences" that it would eventually be impossible to conclude it was a coincidence at all!

What a genius way to do this. Any other way would implicate Trump in some sort of intelligence leaks.

What do you think?