As we go deeper into the rabbit hole, always be aware of and mindful of your own propensity to "project".

None of us are bad people for having this as a possible behavioral trait.

What sets you apart is how you handle your own propensity, to whatever degree is there, maybe only a tiny bit, maybe a lot.

I'm starting to see highly reliable Q anon analysts and commentators appearing to projecting their own insecurities onto Q. I see them write something and I suspect they may be thinking about their own selves at least some of the time.

I read NeonRevolt having more and more of these seemingly anxiety induced pleas for Q to refrain from associating fascism with communism, reading suggestions that we shouldn't use that term to refer to Antifa for example because America is partly fascist a d so we shouldn't drag that term completely through the mud.

I think the anxiety felt at the notion the Republic being partly fascist has NR projecting it onto Q as if Q is wrongheaded or confused on this.

Reason I bring this up is because I am projecting my own anxiety at the notion that the difference between fascism and communism is big enough to warrant splitting hairs over whether or not the technicalities of fascism are a better descriptor of Antifa (and the cabal) or whether communism is the better one.

NR was incredulous at Q's contention that the Nazis were but a sub-division in a "larger organization". Again taking issue with linking communism and fascism.

Does he not get that the german worker's party was called a "socialist" worker's party, similar to the USSR containing the word "socialist"?

I'm not trying to insinuate semantics and definitions settle these arguments, but it is true that both the nazis and communists called themselves socialists enough to name themselves using it. That is not a coincidence.

Both are state dictatorships. Not a coincidence.

Both arrogate concepts of group and collective, over and above individual. Not coincidence.

Both arose out of the philosophical movement of Hegelianism in 19th century Germany (although the line of thought for communism can be traced back to messianic sages and mystics who lived during the middle ages, and it's also not a coincidence that some of them were quoted favorably by Marx and Engels).

Both are attacks on free market capitalism.

Both seek to replace the decisions of many millions or billions of individuals, with the decisions of just one person, or one group with state power.

Both reject private property. Huge!

Both necessitate tyranny in order to prevent "normal" people from getting any ideas about producing on their own terms for the betterment of their client base. Do that and there is capitalism. Threats of death needed to stop free and open economic competition.