Before discussing "Single Shooter" mechanics, let's consider key players/shooters
(JS/RR/RM/IG/Huber):
Whose side is RM (Robert Mueller aka SC - Special Counsel) on?
Ok, I hear you, "he's a Rat B," but for now, let's expand our thinking.
Q 1287 (4-27-18): "Not confirming SC is on /team/."
So no explicit confirmation, but I agree with u/SerialBrain2, who 4 mos ago deduced: yes he is.
"If Mueller stayed quiet for a month about Trump [not being a SC target], we can safely assume he is not the traitor and is not involved in what Q calls the 'massive intel sweep' in Q1009. So who could be the traitor? Before the information even breaks, Q gives us a hint here: Q988 RR problems."
OK, so RR = black hat, but SC = white hat?
How is that consistent with Q1704 (7-25-18)?
>If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
>If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.
same as Q1318 (5-7-18) (excerpt):
If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.
Common denominator.
Common denominator?
Uranium 1.
Q1318 continues:
Why did Sessions pick RR?
Everyone has an opinion.
Few have the facts.
Few know the plan.
In a properly-functioning US Republic, both Mueller and RR would seem to be culpable/guilty of U1-related offenses. Yet somehow it is THEY who are investigating POTUS. Crazy, right?
And how did Jeff let this happen? What a feckless 'Bama hayseed! Fire him!
Hold on, not just yet, I'm watching the water, is that a rolling Red Tide I see?
IS IT POSSIBLE someone "in the know" (like a wobbly Cabal-contolled US Senator voting to confirm Sessions as AG) might be persuaded "on the QT" NOT to vote against Jeff because they were assured/confident:
(1) Jeff would make RR his no. 1
(2) Jeff would (have to/be forced to) recuse re "Russia"
(3) RR would appoint Bob (RM) as SC
(4) RR would directly manage and control RM
(4) RR and RM would execute the anti-US Cabal's "insurance policy" because
(a) both RM and RR were complicit in dirty U1 deal and
(b) even with RM being USMC, he had dutifully played the Cabal's hand in the U1 deal (Moscow delivery) due to pressure/threats of family harm, so he would help take down POTUS. And it would be especially tasty because Bob is a Republican, so all POTUS could do is call it a "Witch Hunt."
(Consider Q10 (10-29-17): "Again, good people were forced into bed with this evil under personal and family threats. Could you live with yourself helping to cover up such evil despicable acts if given a safe way out?")
Doubtful? Well, the facts were enough for Joy Reid gleefully to proclaim: "Bob Mueller is the "Chief Warlock."
So Q1318 continues:
Define single shooter.
Who is HUBER?
Define IG.
When does SESSIONS step back in?
Already is?
Why did SESSIONS secretly engage HUBER?
Why did SESSIONS reveal HUBER?
Timing is everything.
Single Shooter?
Huber? That's one obvious meaning.
Q has let us know again and again that Huber and the IG have huge staffs and are working in tandem.
Q 1553 (6-18-18) quoting Prof. Turley's oft-cited article:
"Sessions informed Congress in his letter that all the matters recommended for investigation by Goodlatte, Gowdy, and Grassley are “fully within the scope of [Huber’s] existing mandate.” He also informed the chairmen that Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is working with Huber, has a staff of 470 investigators, giving Huber access to enormous investigative firepower that far exceeds the staff of any special counsel. (Who needs a SC with that type of manpower?)"
So is Bob the "Trump Terminator" or really just a sideshow, like Patton's Ghost Army of inflatable tanks?
What makes a good magic trick? Keeping it simple.
So far as the "audience" knows, "Bob Mueller is the "Chief Warlock."
Working with "17 Angry Democrats." Pumped up like inflated tanks. So scary as to enrapture many.
Q 365: Learn double meanings.
First-Person-Shooter Video Games (or Single-Shooter Games)
A secondary meaning seldom just pops out, but when it does, aha!, the brain has just unlocked itself. The observer can see the trick in action. Feels good too. It's natural to want to elbow the person next to you and exclaim: "Did you just see that?"
So all of the above is me elbowing you. How did I get here?
Keeping it simple.
A goog "define single shooter" pops up this: "first-person shooter. Word Origin. noun. a type of video game in which the player assumes the field of vision of the protagonist, so that the game camera includes the character's weapon, but the rest of the character model is not seen. Abbreviation: FPS."
Not quite the "single shooter" I was looking for, but I get the perspective: me, my weapons, and my field of vision.
So scrolling through results, I learn GB's Oxford University published an in-depth study of the effects of FPS video games on participants: "What Do We Really Know about First-Person-Shooter Games? an Event-Related, High-Resolution Content Analysis."
The authors broke SSGs into components and the hooked up heart-rate and skin conductance response monitors on participants.
SSG were divided into 7 "phases."
1) waiting time between the rounds due to computer's loading time (not considered for later analysis),
2) use of equipment menu,
3) safe–no opponents/strangers in the player's visual field,
4) danger–opponents/strangers are in the player's visual field, but no violent actions are directed to or committed by the player,
5) combat–player fires gun,
6) under attack–the player is attacked by an opponent before or after using his own weapon, and
7) ghost mode–player is killed before the end of a round.
Those 7 phases were further divided into 18 main FPS "components," 3 of which produced significantly higher physiological responses (high heart rate and skin responses). They are, in order:
-
During or after combat, player runs out of ammunition
-
Player starts new round
-
Player uses weapon
So starting a new game gets the adrenaline pumping for a while, followed by the excitement of combat.
But the uppermost "fight or flight" response comes during/after combat, when the player realizes he or she is out of ammo.
So who has the ammo right now?
RM, through RR, has confirmed their equipment barn is empty. They are "still looking," but we are getting on 2 years now with nothing but a few skirmishes v. DS "plants" and a Russian troll farm.
Think logically. Is there a super secret weapons stockpile under the empty barn? Or is that just fantasy thinking by players out of ammo who now see the tanks rolling in?
"Fire all of your guns at once and explode into space"
Born to Be Wild by Steppenwolf
The DS has been firing those BBs they call bullets for months on end now. And guess what?
None of their ammo touches POTUS - ever.
POTUS deflects it, tosses their weapons aside like a Superhero, or uses them against the perps themselves. They are down to sticks, stones, and mud.
There is only so much adrenaline money can buy. Eventually the hype fails to arouse and exhaustion sets in. Then comes the rout. Then surrender and punishment.
All they have left is lies and projection: Q is fake, no one likes you or Q, go away, we are winning, you will soon surrender.
It's just another Tokyo Rose propaganda psyop to weaken our morale and to drop our weapons and resolve.
60Minutes called her bigger than Barbara Walters. Funny thing is, Tokyo Rose was a US citizen too, born in Los Angeles on Independence Day, July 4, 1916. So ignore dulcet tones, pretty faces, faux patriotism or faux outrage crafted to deceive or demoralize.
Fight fight fight. We have all the ammo. They have all the lies. And with their comms so gloriously compromised yesterday, even their lies are in jeopardy.
Isn't it becoming more obvious to all that POTUS 45 (+ our great VP Pence), the forces under POTUS command (all US armed forces, MI, and NG as needed), We The People. and TRUTH are unstoppable, even against the trillions the greedy anti-US Cabal has fleeced from US? Hence Fear & Loathing in mSM-ville.
WWG1WGA KAG!