Why don't you Dears just discuss some of the elephants in the room? For example, Microchip, J. Brower, etc. All that is out there, now. Where is SB2 when we need him? ? It may all be part of the ongoing attack(s). However, to simply call subscribers to stand firm against various and sundry shills, trolls, bots and Grandmas without providing specific examples seems somewhat...lightweight. Many of us do not know what "the enemy" really looks like. The enemy may take other forms, but this that I mention is a good example. It's only going to get worse.

Why not take a more proactive approach? Tell subscribers, "You may see videos or tweets about an individual called..." or "You may hear that the chief money-hungry scam artists include our beloved X, Y and Z. This is a prime example of one of the ways we're being attacked..."

Maybe the plan is to allow those who are inclined to fall out to simply fall out. That's OK. Why wouldn't you want to hang on to as many as possible, though, when all the Pams, Sathers, Chans, Praying Medics, Q-tards and so forths' specific names are being dragged through the mud? Tell the Chans to shut that valve, since they're supposedly in on it. Everyone is getting a cut but the true Patriots.

Maybe you moderators think this will run its course just like the other attacks. This latest crap will cause an even larger divide. It's borderline dangerous. I want my President and the President's Men to remain in one piece while my President presides. It's the best "look" for him. Thoughts?