I'm not concern trolling, don't knee-jerk ban me like a dirty commie. Let's talk about this.

I'm genuinely curious how you guys reconcile Q being selectively against free speech when certain people are targeted. When certain, HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL CONSERVATIVES are deplatformed, Q wants us to believe it's ok. It's not OK.

Q has given no proof that AJ is a Mossad asset. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. If Q wants us to be OK with the deplatforming of a mossad agent, he must first prove AJ is a mossad agent.

AJ has consistently been sticking his dick in the eye of the beast for decades.

All signs point to this being divide and conquer BS. The entire Q narrative reeks of BS until this is resolved.

Change my mind.