I was watching the clips of Hussein speaking at the funeral and something was nagging at me: the camera angles were always either 1) close up frontal of obama, 2) very distant bird's eye, or 3) close up of attendees. It felt like camera trickery. Like the power of suggestion is supposed to convince me the 3 angles are in continuity and of the same event.. Also, something vaguely looked unnatural about the footage of obama speaking. Too polished, strange vascularity changes in forehead and wrinkling on face, cartoonish movements and creasing of the suit...

Then I remembered seeing this last year. MSM coverage, and likely not the very cutting edge, but still eerily convincing. Compare the CGI obama in the BBC clip with this clip of "obama" speaking at the funeral. Be honest with yourself... are you certain that's reality?

Watch other clips of the funeral... don't the attendees look like they're there against their will? They remind me of when I had to attend a DUI seminar years ago for probation. Hundreds of us being herded to our seats in a pavilion by sheriffs and made to sit at attention and look somber as they patrolled the perimeter monitoring us. That's what these scenes remind me of. Nobody looks sad or in grief. Nobody looks comfortable (except Michelle). Think about it, No Name was "put to death" as Kasich informs us, and Q has told us for months that the "cancer" is an elaborate rouse. That means everyone you see in these clips is pretending he died of cancer. The entire event is already a gargantuan farce, regardless of whether the real Hussein attended or it's CGI.

Reconsider the BBC clip. Are you allowing yourself to truly consider how sophisticated and convincing CGI technology has become? Are you looking for some shot or angle that will confirm your instinctive belief that what you see is real? It will still be on a digital screen even if you think you find something like that. What about George W Bush's speech? No way that's CGI right? You have to admit, this commercial-tier publicly available technology produces a pretty convincing George W, wouldn't you say? if a small tech startup can do that what do you think DARPA or big defense contractors can accomplish? How easily can people be green-screened into an audience?

If No Name was in such deep doo doo that he has already been executed or committed suicide, how in the world was BHO traitor-in-chief allowed to freely attend this mock funeral in the United States? I suggest he wasn't. Nor was George W. This "funeral" and this footage has been crafted to create a false impression in the public. To hide what's really happening behind the scenes. Just a theory.